Skip to main content

Security report for wirlc.com

Women In Retail Leadership Circle · Retail · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Women In Retail Leadership Circle (WIRLC) is a professional membership community focused on empowering women executives in the retail and brand sectors through leadership development, events, and exclusive content. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in relevant content, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, it leverages WordPress CMS with modern plugins and tracking tools, maintaining good security practices including HTTPS and reCAPTCHA. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, though the association with NAPCO Media supports legitimacy. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. Overall, the site presents a strong business and technical profile with minor areas for security enhancement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wirlc.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wirlc.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for wirlc.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WIRLC operates a membership-driven business model targeting women leaders in retail, offering networking, events, and professional resources. It holds a niche market position supported by a reputable parent company, NAPCO Media. The site integrates partnerships with related event and media platforms, enhancing its ecosystem. Revenue likely derives from memberships, event fees, and sponsorships. The content strategy is robust, supporting member engagement and brand authority. Growth potential is supported by virtual and in-person events and a strong advisory board. The business demonstrates professionalism and trustworthiness through visible testimonials and governance.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enforcement, use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms, and no visible sensitive data exposure. Security headers are minimal but include X-Content-Type-Options. The site uses reputable plugins and scripts, though additional headers like Content-Security-Policy and HSTS would strengthen defenses. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found. Privacy compliance is well addressed with cookie consent and privacy policies. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are absent, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the site against common attacks.
  2. Publish a clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update all WordPress components to mitigate risks from outdated software.
  4. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to enhance user privacy and reduce attack surface.
  5. Improve WHOIS domain registration transparency to strengthen trust and legitimacy signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Women In Retail Leadership Circle
Description
Women in Retail Leadership Circle (WIRLC) is an exclusive community of women executives at leading retailers and brands focused on leadership development through events, content, and networking.
Key services
Membership, Events (in-person and virtual), Content and resources, Networking and peer groups, Partnership opportunities
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Gravity Forms, Paid Memberships Pro, Fancybox, Owl Carousel, Flexslider
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (e.g., theme-my-login)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Parsely, Lytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Outbrain, AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Parsely
Marketing tools
Lytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on women leadership in retail industry
  3. Multiple membership and event offerings with gated content
  4. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices
  5. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present
  6. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content
  8. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern but mitigated by known parent company
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Yoast SEO, Gravity Forms, and various UI libraries like Owl Carousel and Fancybox. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Parsely, and Lytics, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses secure HTTPS connections and reCAPTCHA for form protection. Technical debt appears low, but there is room for improvement in security headers and hosting transparency. Overall, the infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wirlc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wirlc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.