Skip to main content

Security report for winncare.com

Winncare · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Winncare is a well-established European healthcare company specializing in the design and manufacture of medical devices for dependent patients. Their product portfolio includes pressure area care, patient handling, hygiene, fall management, and medical beds, targeting healthcare professionals and caregivers. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and content-rich, reflecting a mature digital presence. However, the lack of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, but security headers and explicit policies are missing. Privacy compliance is partial with a cookie consent mechanism but no clear privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the site is trustworthy but would benefit from improved transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of winncare.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching winncare.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention winncare.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for winncare.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Winncare holds a strong market position in the healthcare sector with a broad product range and multiple acquisitions, indicating growth and expansion. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and distributing medical devices and providing related services such as support and training. The company targets healthcare providers, caregivers, and dependent patients across Europe, supported by multiple country-specific domains. The website content and structure support their business goals, but the absence of clear contact details and privacy policies may impact customer trust. The company appears to be large and established, with a focus on innovation and sustainability.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses modern web technologies, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of key security headers and explicit security policies reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. The lack of WHOIS data and domain registration details is a notable risk factor. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but improvements in security documentation and header implementation are recommended to enhance protection and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration details to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Winncare
Description
Winncare is a manufacturer of medical devices for dependent patients, designing and producing innovative healthcare solutions that promote independence, comfort, and dignity for patients and caregivers. The company focuses on pressure area care, patient handling, hygiene, fall management, and medical beds & furniture. It operates across Europe with a history of over 40 years and emphasizes environmental and social commitments.
Key services
Manufacture of medical devices, Pressure area care products, Patient handling equipment, Hygiene products, Fall management solutions, Medical beds and furniture, Support and training services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WordPress, Ajax Search Lite, Search Filter Pro, WP Rocket, Slick Slider, SweetAlert2
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress environment)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on healthcare products.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  6. Multiple language versions and country-specific domains exist, indicating international presence.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  10. No explicit security or incident response information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Ajax Search Lite, and WP Rocket for performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive and uses Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and caching mechanisms in place. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 51/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with winncare.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review winncare.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.