Skip to main content

Security report for wineofczechrepublic.cz

Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.vinazmoravyvinazcech.cz serves as a promotional platform for wines from the Moravia and Bohemia regions in the Czech Republic. It targets wine enthusiasts, tourists, and buyers interested in regional wines, offering information on vineyards, wine varieties, and events. The site is built using modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, providing a good user experience with responsive design and clear navigation. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and ownership details. Security posture is moderate, with no detected advanced security headers or policies, and privacy compliance is low due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site appears professional and relevant to its domain, but improvements in security and compliance documentation are recommended.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of wineofczechrepublic.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wineofczechrepublic.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business focuses on regional wine promotion, likely operating as a small entity within the hospitality sector. Its business model centers on providing informational content and event listings to attract visitors and wine buyers. The website's content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a moderate market position within the regional wine industry. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies, and no external partnerships were identified from the provided data. The lack of contact details and formal policies may limit trust and user engagement.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic, with HTTPS presumably enabled but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. Incident response and security contact information are not present, which may hinder timely handling of security issues. The site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices, including security headers, documented privacy policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Include clear contact information and incident response channels for security and abuse reporting.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website promotes wines from the Moravia and Bohemia regions, showcasing vineyards, wine varieties, events, and related information.
Key services
Wine information, Event listings, Wine variety details, Contact and support for wine-related inquiries
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS Modules
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not found in CZ.NIC registry
  2. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content
  5. No social media links detected in the provided HTML snippet
  6. Website uses modern React/Next.js framework with CSS modules
  7. No obvious security headers or advanced security configurations detected
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet
  9. Content is focused on wine promotion in Moravia and Bohemia regions
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React and Next.js technology stack, which supports good performance and mobile responsiveness. CSS modules are used for styling, indicating modular and maintainable code. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading or technical debt. Accessibility features appear basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present. There is an opportunity to enhance technical implementation by adding accessibility improvements, SEO enhancements, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wineofczechrepublic.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wineofczechrepublic.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.