Skip to main content

Security report for winbase.nl

Health Cloud Initiative · Healthcare · Netherlands

Partial score · DNS & email only

50/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Health Cloud Initiative (HCI) is a Dutch healthcare software provider specializing in comprehensive EHR solutions and digital healthcare platforms. The company serves a broad range of healthcare providers including mental health institutions, paramedical practices, general practitioners, pharmacies, dental care, and rehabilitation care. With over 4 million users and 40,000 healthcare professionals, HCI holds a significant market position in the Netherlands, offering an all-in-one platform that integrates EHR, eHealth apps, client environments, and consultancy services. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence, targeting healthcare providers seeking efficient and user-friendly software solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses modern web technologies, though performance metrics are not explicitly available. Security-wise, the site has strong indicators such as ISO 27001 and NEN 7510 certifications and appropriate security headers; however, it critically lacks a valid SSL certificate and TLS support, which severely impacts its security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with accessible privacy and cookie policies, and GDPR compliance is evident. Overall, while the business and content quality are excellent, the lack of proper SSL/TLS implementation poses a significant risk that should be urgently addressed to protect user data and maintain trust.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching winbase.nl

This scan found 4 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
Average
50

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HCI operates in the healthcare technology sector with a SaaS business model, providing integrated EHR and digital communication solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive platform tailored to various healthcare disciplines and its strong user base. The company leverages partnerships with platforms like Quli and Paranice to enhance its service offerings. The business model focuses on delivering convenience and efficiency to healthcare providers and patients, supported by consultancy and training services. Growth indicators include a large user base and certifications that enhance credibility. The website's content and navigation clearly target healthcare professionals, emphasizing ease of use and integration. Strategic observations suggest HCI is well-positioned in the Dutch healthcare market but must improve its security infrastructure to sustain growth and trust.

Security posture

The security maturity of HCI's website is mixed. Positive aspects include the presence of multiple security headers (HSTS header present but not enabled, X-XSS-Protection, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) and certifications such as ISO 27001 and NEN 7510, indicating organizational commitment to security standards. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS protocol support are critical vulnerabilities that expose users to data interception and undermine trust. No OCSP stapling or session resumption mechanisms are implemented, which could affect both security and performance. There is no explicit incident response contact information or vulnerability disclosure policy found. Overall, the site requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of security best practices to align with industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL certificate supporting TLS 1.2 or higher to secure all communications.
  2. Enable and configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to enforce HTTPS usage.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  4. Publish an incident response policy and provide clear security contact channels for vulnerability reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and ensure no sensitive data is exposed in the website content or scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder plugin, with additional plugins such as Ninja Forms and GTranslate for multilingual support. The hosting provider is managedwphosting.nl. The site uses jQuery and modern CSS with responsive design techniques, ensuring good mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data describing the organization and website. Performance data is not available, but the site includes lazy loading and prefetching scripts. Technical risks include the lack of SSL/TLS, which is a major concern. The site is well-structured and professionally designed, but technical debt may exist in the form of outdated or missing security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with winbase.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review winbase.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.