Skip to main content

Security report for wiltonbradley.com

Wilton Bradley Ltd · Retail · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wilton Bradley Ltd is a UK-based company specializing in the design, development, sourcing, distribution, and wholesale supply of quality branded consumer leisure goods. The company serves specialist retailers and trade customers, offering a broad portfolio of products and services including product design, global sourcing, flexible supply options, and sales and marketing support. The website reflects a professional and established business with a clear market position in retail distribution. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies that comply with GDPR standards. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though some security headers and explicit incident response information are missing. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable concern, reducing domain trustworthiness despite the professional web presence. Overall, the website is reliable and trustworthy for business interactions but would benefit from improved transparency in domain registration and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wiltonbradley.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
15
Email security
93
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Wilton Bradley operates in the retail sector focusing on consumer leisure goods with a medium-sized business footprint. The company leverages in-house product design and extensive global sourcing experience to maintain a competitive edge. Their business model includes direct supply and wholesale distribution, targeting specialist retailers primarily in the UK and Hong Kong markets. The presence of detailed corporate statements such as the Modern Slavery Statement and Section 172 Statement indicates a commitment to corporate governance and compliance. The partnership with external platforms for B2B sales suggests a collaborative ecosystem. The company’s digital presence is well-maintained, supporting growth and customer engagement through clear navigation and content relevance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and the use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented in line with GDPR requirements, enhancing privacy compliance. However, the lack of HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduce the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy and should be addressed to improve trust. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adding formal security documentation and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Wilton Bradley Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wilton Bradley Ltd
Description
Wilton Bradley specialise in the design, development, sourcing and supply of quality consumer leisure goods, supplying own branded goods to specialist retailers and sourcing products for leading retailers and brand owners.
Key services
Product design & development, Global sourcing, Flexible buying & supply options, Sales & marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Contact Form 7, WP Job Openings plugin, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieControl
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Professional design with clear navigation and good mobile responsiveness.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices evident.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No adult or NSFW content present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site uses several WordPress plugins including Contact Form 7 and WP Job Openings, indicating functionality for user interaction and recruitment. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted resources like fonts and libraries. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with structured data in JSON-LD format. The site is mobile-optimized and has a clear navigation structure. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts and missing HTTP security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wiltonbradley.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wiltonbradley.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.