Skip to main content

Security report for wijspecialmedia.nl

WIJ Special Media B.V. · Media · Netherlands

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WIJ Special Media B.V. is a Dutch media company specializing in data-driven advertising and media services targeting pregnant women and young families. Established in 2006, it holds a market-leading position with a database covering over 80% of the target demographic in the Netherlands. The company offers a comprehensive media portfolio including online, social, print, sampling, and e-commerce services, supported by a strong data foundation for audience targeting. The website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates Google Analytics for tracking. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, though it lacks visible security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wijspecialmedia.nl

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wijspecialmedia.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for wijspecialmedia.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a proprietary database sourced from pregnant women registering for a gift package, enriched post-birth, to create targeted marketing audiences. Its parent company is Moeder en Kind B.V., which holds licensing rights for Prénatal brands. The business model focuses on niche media targeting with data-driven marketing solutions. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and professional content. Partnerships and certifications such as Privacy Waarborg indicate trustworthiness. The company’s digital presence is mature but could improve compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and DNSSEC, indicating strong baseline security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies represent areas for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a dedicated security or incident response page with contact channels for vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear data retention policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
WIJ Special Media B.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WIJ Special Media B.V.
Description
WIJ Special Media (WSM) is a data-oriented media company focused on pregnant women and young families. It is market leader in the communication market for this target group, offering a modern and extensive media portfolio including database-driven audiences for mail campaigns, social advertising, list rental, lead generation, and data enrichment.
Key services
Data audience creation, Mail campaigns, Social advertising, List rental, Lead generation, Content partnerships, Print media, Sampling, E-commerce, Research
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.5, PHP, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap CSS/JS, LayerSlider plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Google Fonts, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin), Redux Framework, WP Multilang plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights Google Analytics plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on a niche media market for young families.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented in multiple locations.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  7. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via email or contact page.
  8. SSL and DNSSEC are properly configured.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, LayerSlider, WPBakery Page Builder, and Slider Revolution. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for design and tracking. Hosting is provided by team.blue nl B.V., a reputable Dutch registrar. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices via Yoast SEO plugin. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No critical technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. The site lacks some accessibility features and security headers, which are recommended for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wijspecialmedia.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wijspecialmedia.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.