Skip to main content

Security report for whc2025prague.com

Institute for TCIM/CAM · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.whc2025prague.com represents the World Health Congress 2025 Prague, an event focused on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine. It is organized by the Institute for TCIM/CAM and supported by multiple international partners and sponsors. The site provides detailed information about the congress program, organizers, partners, venue, and related resources, targeting healthcare professionals and stakeholders in complementary medicine. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA to enhance user experience and security. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and anti-bot measures in place, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy/cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the professional content and partner network mitigate some risk. Overall, the site is a credible resource for its niche audience but should improve privacy compliance and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching whc2025prague.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The World Health Congress 2025 Prague operates as a small, non-profit event organizer in the healthcare sector, specifically focusing on traditional and complementary medicine. Its business model revolves around organizing international congresses, facilitating knowledge exchange, and fostering cooperation among diverse medical disciplines and organizations. The event is supported by a broad ecosystem of partners, including European and international associations, foundations, and media outlets, which strengthens its market position within the niche of integrative medicine. The target audience includes healthcare professionals, researchers, and policy makers interested in complementary medicine. The website content and partner affiliations indicate a well-established network, though the lack of domain WHOIS data suggests a need for verification of domain legitimacy. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships, donations, and event registrations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms from automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security events. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. To enhance security, the site should implement recommended HTTP security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and provide clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Verify and publish domain WHOIS registration details to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure process to improve security transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are used.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Institute for TCIM/CAM
Description
An event promoting traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine, aiming to foster cooperation across various medical disciplines and international organizations.
Key services
Organizing congress events, Providing congress program and recordings, Facilitating international cooperation in TCIM/CAM
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.1.1, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, indicating potential compliance gap
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address
  4. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  5. Use of modern tracking and anti-bot technologies like Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for an active .com domain
  7. Strong international partner and sponsor network
  8. Mobile optimized with responsive design
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web technology stack with jQuery 3.1.1, Google Tag Manager for analytics, Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, and Facebook SDK for social integration. The HTML is well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. The site is mobile responsive with CSS media queries and uses lazy loading for images via the unveil.js library, improving performance. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with embedded YouTube videos and multiple external resources. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic HTML. SEO is good with descriptive meta tags and alternate language links. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with whc2025prague.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review whc2025prague.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.