Skip to main content

Security report for weselmarketing.de

WeselMarketing GmbH · Hospitality · Germany

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WeselMarketing GmbH operates the official tourism and city marketing website for the city of Wesel, Germany. The website provides comprehensive information about cultural attractions, natural sites, events, travel planning, and local services aimed at tourists, visitors, and residents. The business is positioned as a key promoter of Wesel's tourism sector, leveraging digital channels to enhance visitor engagement and city branding. The site is well-structured, professionally designed, and offers multilingual support, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the website is built on the Drupal CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies including JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and employs a robust cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR standards. Performance is moderate with good SEO and accessibility practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses session cookies appropriately. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are recommended for enhanced trust and compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong business credibility and privacy compliance posture, with room for improvement in formal security documentation and incident readiness. The domain registration data aligns with the business location and sector, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing security policies, adding vulnerability disclosure, and enhancing security headers to further strengthen the security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weselmarketing.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention weselmarketing.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for weselmarketing.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WeselMarketing GmbH serves as the official city marketing and tourism promotion entity for Wesel, Germany. Its business model focuses on enhancing the city's attractiveness through digital content, event promotion, and visitor services. The company targets tourists, local residents, and business partners, leveraging a comprehensive website with multilingual support and social media integration. The organization benefits from strong branding consistency and trust signals such as official contact details and cookie compliance. The market position is stable within the regional tourism sector, with potential growth through enhanced digital marketing and partnerships. Revenue streams likely include city funding and promotional services. The company maintains a medium-sized operational scale with a focus on hospitality and government sectors.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and appropriate cookie management including consent mechanisms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness. Security headers are not explicitly detected, suggesting an opportunity to improve defense-in-depth. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager is managed with consent but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy on the website to inform users and stakeholders.
  2. Implement and disclose a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Add incident response contact information, such as a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
WeselMarketing GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WeselMarketing GmbH
Description
Tourism and city marketing for the city of Wesel, promoting cultural, natural, and recreational attractions, events, and visitor information.
Key services
Tourism information, Event promotion, Travel planning, City marketing, Cultural and recreational highlights
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, Google Tag Manager, CookiesJSR, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of session cookies for logged-in users

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong focus on tourism and city marketing for Wesel, Germany.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with multiple categories and granular controls.
  4. Use of Drupal CMS with modern frontend technologies.
  5. Presence of Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing.
  6. Clear contact information including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info published.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, Instagram.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS, leveraging modern frontend technologies including JavaScript and CSS. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, integrated with a GDPR-compliant cookie consent framework (CookiesJSR). The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but DNS uses Deutsche Telekom and KRZN name servers, indicating a German hosting environment. The site structure and metadata support good SEO practices. Technical risks include the lack of explicit security headers and absence of formal security documentation, which could impact resilience against web-based attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weselmarketing.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weselmarketing.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.