Skip to main content

Security report for werkenbijmn.nl

MN · Finance · Netherlands

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Werken bij MN is the official career website for MN, a large Dutch financial services company specializing in pension and asset management. The website targets job seekers interested in employment opportunities at MN, serving as a recruitment and employer branding platform. The site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and Bootstrap, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms shows some attention to privacy compliance, although no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected in the provided content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage and bot protection, but lacks visible security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is professional and functional but could improve in privacy transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching werkenbijmn.nl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
73
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MN operates in the finance sector, focusing on pension management and asset management services. The website serves as a recruitment portal, indicating a business model that includes talent acquisition and employer branding. MN is a well-established entity in the Netherlands, reflected by consistent WHOIS data and domain age. The site’s content is basic but consistent with the company’s branding. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries linked via the website. The use of third-party scripts for cookie consent and analytics suggests integration with common marketing and compliance tools. The absence of detailed contact information or legal disclosures on the site may limit transparency for some users.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, which are positive security measures. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, and there is no visible incident response contact information. The cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating some GDPR compliance efforts. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to enhance header implementation, publish security policies, and improve privacy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen security posture.
  3. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MN
Description
Werken bij MN is a recruitment/career website for MN, a financial services company focused on pensions and asset management.
Key services
Pension management, Asset management, Employment opportunities at MN
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Cookie Script, FontAwesome, Bootstrap 4.5, jQuery (implied by $ usage), YouTube Player API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by origin-trial meta and URLs)
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via a third-party script
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content
  5. Use of modern web technologies and standard libraries
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information
  7. WHOIS data consistent with business identity and location
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap 4.5 for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The presence of reCAPTCHA indicates bot mitigation efforts. The site loads external scripts from trusted domains such as Google and Cookie Script. Performance is moderate with standard modern web technologies. Mobile optimization appears good based on Bootstrap usage. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site could benefit from improved SEO meta descriptions and structured data to enhance search engine visibility. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic HTML.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with werkenbijmn.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review werkenbijmn.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.