Skip to main content

Security report for weresmartcera.be

Tablebooker bv · Hospitality · Belgium

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

We're Smart® Cera is a Belgian event campaign promoting restaurants that emphasize vegetables and fruits, running from October 2024 to February 2025 with 35 participating restaurants. The website serves as an informational and promotional platform targeting consumers interested in healthy dining options. The business operates in the hospitality and non-profit sectors, with Tablebooker bv as the organizing entity. The site is multilingual and provides partner information and contact details, supporting consumer engagement and event awareness. Technically, the website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, RequireJS, and a cookie consent library, with external resources loaded from reputable CDNs. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with basic accessibility and SEO features. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security headers or advanced security policies are evident. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes cookie consent with opt-in/out options, but lacks visible security headers and formal security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS data shows a consistent and legitimate domain registration aligned with the business timeline, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with basic privacy requirements. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, adding terms of service and security policies, improving accessibility, and regularly auditing third-party scripts to maintain security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weresmartcera.be

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business positions itself as a niche event organizer in the hospitality sector, focusing on promoting healthy eating through a campaign involving multiple restaurants in Belgium. Its competitive advantage lies in its partnership ecosystem including Cera cooperative and Tablebooker bv, leveraging cooperative and digital booking platforms. The business model centers on event promotion and consumer engagement rather than direct sales. Target customers are health-conscious consumers and restaurant patrons. Growth indicators include multi-year event planning and partner collaborations. The partnership ecosystem is strong with aligned organizations supporting sustainability and cooperative values.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enabled, and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the security posture. No incident response or security policies are publicly available, indicating potential gaps in formal security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but reliance on multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing vigilance. GDPR compliance is supported by privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the public content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear security and incident response policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  4. Complete SEO metadata and structured data to improve search engine visibility and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tablebooker bv
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tablebooker bv
Description
A campaign/event promoting restaurants with a focus on vegetables and fruits, running from 03/10/2024 to 08/02/2025, involving 35 participating restaurants in Belgium.
Key services
Restaurant promotion, Event organization, Consumer engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, RequireJS, CookieConsent (orestbida), Flexslider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/opt-out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieConsent by orestbida
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a promotional event site for a healthy eating campaign in Belgium.
  2. Content is multilingual with language switcher (nl, fr, en).
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with clear user options.
  4. Contact information is provided but no email addresses explicitly found in HTML.
  5. No visible forms for data collection on the homepage.
  6. Use of common JS libraries and CDN-hosted resources.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. Partners include weresmartworld.com and cera.coop.
  10. Social media links to Facebook and Twitter present in footer.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a JavaScript-heavy front end with RequireJS module loading, jQuery, and Flexslider for UI components. Cookie consent is managed via a modern consent library. Resources are loaded from reputable CDNs, supporting performance and availability. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and layout. However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Technical debt appears low but could be improved with enhanced SEO and accessibility. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond registrar information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weresmartcera.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weresmartcera.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.