Skip to main content

Security report for weproject.media

ТОО One Media Press · Media · Kazakhstan

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Weproject.media is a lifestyle media outlet focused on people and culture in Central Asia, primarily Kazakhstan. It positions itself as a unique regional media source without politics or religion, targeting a broad audience interested in positive lifestyle content. The company behind the site is ТОО One Media Press, based in Astana, Kazakhstan. The website offers articles, news, and advertising services, supported by active social media channels and subscription options. Technically, the site uses Bitrix CMS, jQuery, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, and SendPulse. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and professional design. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, but explicit security headers are missing, and privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weproject.media

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the media sector, focusing on lifestyle content for Central Asian audiences. It leverages a content-driven business model with revenue likely from advertising and partnerships, including wemedia.group. The company maintains a consistent brand and has a moderate market position as a regional media outlet. The presence of multiple social media platforms and subscription forms indicates engagement strategies. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests room for improvement in regulatory compliance. The company appears small but professional, with a clear focus on regional culture and lifestyle.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern tracking and marketing technologies. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Forms are present but no explicit security measures like CSRF tokens are visible in the HTML. The extensive use of third-party scripts increases the attack surface. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, privacy policies, and formal incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Conduct security audits and vulnerability scans on the CMS and third-party libraries.
  4. Establish an incident response plan and publish contact channels for security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and ensure all forms have proper security controls like CSRF protection.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ТОО One Media Press
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ТОО One Media Press
Description
Единственное в Центральной Азии лайфстайл издание без политики, религии и разрушительных новостей
Key services
Публикация статей и новостей, Реклама, Подписка на рассылку
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bitrix CMS, SendPulse, Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bitrix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async scripts to improve loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, SumoMe
Marketing tools
SendPulse
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional lifestyle media outlet focused on Central Asia
  2. Content is in Russian with options for English and Kazakh
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  4. Multiple analytics and tracking tools are used extensively
  5. Site uses Bitrix CMS and common JS libraries
  6. No security headers explicitly detected in HTML content
  7. Contact information is available via phone, address, and subscription form
  8. Social media presence is strong with YouTube, Telegram, Instagram, and Facebook links
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Bitrix CMS with jQuery and uses several third-party services for analytics, marketing, and push notifications. The site loads asynchronously many scripts to optimize performance but still shows moderate loading speed. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and mobile-specific UI elements. SEO is supported by meta tags, canonical links, and structured data in JSON-LD format. However, some technical debt is visible in missing security headers and lack of explicit accessibility features. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weproject.media. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weproject.media.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.