Skip to main content

Security report for wembleypark.com

Wembley Park · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wembley Park is a prominent London neighbourhood website showcasing a variety of attractions including Wembley Stadium, OVO Arena, shopping, dining, and cultural events. The site targets visitors, tourists, and local residents, positioning itself as a key leisure and real estate destination. The business model revolves around real estate development and destination management with a strong retail and hospitality focus. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and third-party analytics tools, though some minor issues such as an incorrect meta description and lack of DNSSEC were noted. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks some security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wembleypark.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a large, established real estate and leisure business with a domain age dating back to 1999, indicating long-term market presence. It leverages partnerships with major brands and venues, offering diverse services from events to shopping and dining. The target market includes general consumers and tourists. The business benefits from strong branding consistency and trust signals such as Facebook domain verification and Google Analytics integration. However, the absence of explicit contact information and privacy policies may limit user trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates multiple tracking and marketing scripts, indicating a mature digital presence. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers reduces its security robustness. The meta description leak of a Django internal object suggests a minor development oversight. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder security incident management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Correct the meta description to avoid exposing internal framework objects.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  5. Add vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information to improve security transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wembley Park
Description
Wembley Park is a vibrant neighbourhood in London offering attractions such as Wembley Stadium, OVO Arena, shopping at London Designer Outlet, dining at Boxpark, and public art installations.
Key services
Event hosting, Retail shopping, Dining and entertainment, Public art and cultural experiences, Residential living
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Vimeo Player, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Django (implied by meta description error), StimulusJS (data-controller attributes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Marketing tools
Metricool, SiteControl
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established real estate and leisure destination site for Wembley Park in London.
  2. Content is rich with attractions, events, and local information.
  3. Some minor technical issues such as incorrect meta description content.
  4. No visible privacy or cookie policies found in the provided content.
  5. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. DNSSEC not enabled on domain.
  10. HTTPS is enabled and used site-wide.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and StimulusJS controllers. It appears to be built on Django or a similar framework, though some template rendering issues exist. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and images, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is basic with some meta tag issues. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses Vimeo for video content and Swiper.js for carousels. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved SEO and security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wembleypark.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wembleypark.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.