Skip to main content

Security report for weekendinriga.com

Weekend In Riga · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Weekend In Riga is a small hospitality and tourism service provider specializing in organizing events, tours, nightlife experiences, and accommodation in Riga, Latvia. The company targets tourists seeking leisure and nightlife activities in the Baltic region, offering a variety of packages and custom event planning services. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, indicating basic GDPR compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and credible for its business purpose but would benefit from improved transparency and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weekendinriga.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on tourism and nightlife in Riga. It leverages a service-based business model offering packaged and custom experiences, including day and night activities, accommodation, and transfers. The market position is niche regional with a small company size. The presence of secure payment options and personal online accounts indicates a customer-centric approach. The company maintains active social media profiles on Facebook and Instagram, enhancing its marketing reach. The lack of WHOIS data and security policy details suggests areas for improvement in corporate transparency and compliance. The business appears stable with 6 years in operation as claimed on the site, targeting mature tourists interested in nightlife and entertainment.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure payment references, which are positive security indicators. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, limiting the site's preparedness for security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and JivoSite live chat introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  4. Improve WHOIS registration transparency to increase domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights explicitly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Weekend In Riga
Description
Weekend In Riga offers event planning, tours, nightlife experiences, daytime activities, accommodation booking, transfers, and all-inclusive packages focused on providing fun and excitement in Riga, Latvia and the Baltic region.
Key services
Day activities, Night activities, Weekend packages, Accommodation booking, Airport and hotel transfers, Custom package creation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Owl Carousel, jQuery Fancybox, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, JivoSite live chat, Roistat analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure payment references
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Roistat
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Roistat
Marketing tools
JivoSite live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on tourism and nightlife in Riga, Latvia.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  4. Site uses modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. Adult-themed nightlife content present, suitable for mature audiences.
  9. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. Website design and navigation are professional and user-friendly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, jQuery UI, Owl Carousel, and Fancybox for UI components and interactivity. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking, alongside Roistat analytics and JivoSite live chat for customer engagement. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks some security best practices such as security headers, which should be addressed to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weekendinriga.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weekendinriga.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.