Skip to main content

Security report for webstudio.team

Masarykova univerzita, Lekarska fakulta · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Webstudio.team is a specialized platform operated by Masarykova univerzita's Faculty of Medicine, focusing on delivering healthcare data visualization and web applications that bridge state and academic sectors. Their services include interactive visualizations, graphic design, editorial work, and full-cycle web development tailored to healthcare and medical education projects. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence, targeting academic institutions, healthcare professionals, and government entities in the Czech Republic. Technically, the site employs modern web standards with JavaScript-based analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity, ensuring moderate user tracking and performance. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though additional security headers and explicit policies could enhance their posture. The domain registration details align well with the academic nature of the business, reinforcing legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is well-structured, secure, and professionally maintained, with room for improvement in privacy policy transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of webstudio.team. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webstudio.team

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates within the healthcare and education sectors, leveraging its affiliation with Masarykova univerzita to provide niche services in healthcare data visualization and web development. Their market position is focused on academic and governmental collaborations, offering specialized project-based services. The business model revolves around delivering tailored digital solutions for healthcare data presentation and education, supported by a small but professional team. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled communication channel primarily via contact forms. The use of Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity indicates an interest in user behavior insights to optimize service delivery. The company benefits from trust signals such as institutional affiliation and professional design, positioning it well within its niche market.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The presence of cookie consent aligns with privacy best practices. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy represents an area for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which could be a gap in security transparency. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent, with no privacy protection that might obscure ownership, enhancing trust. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for an academic project site but could be enhanced to meet higher compliance standards such as ISO 27001 or NIST frameworks.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement additional security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Add explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts or a security.txt file.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  5. Consider providing direct contact emails or phone numbers for better user trust and support.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Masarykova univerzita, Lekarska fakulta
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Masarykova univerzita, Lekarska fakulta
Description
Webstudio is a collaboration platform between state and academic sectors, involved in healthcare and medical education projects. They create interactive visualizations of healthcare data, graphics, and editorial work, delivering healthcare data on the web from design through development to final application.
Key services
Interactive healthcare data visualizations, Graphic design, Editorial services, Web application development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and focused on healthcare data visualization and academic collaboration.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found, but cookie consent is implemented.
  4. Contact information is limited to a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Security posture is good but can be improved with additional headers and policies.
  6. WHOIS data confirms legitimacy and consistency with the academic institution.
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity indicates moderate user tracking.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard HTML5 and CSS3 with JavaScript for analytics and user interaction. Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity are integrated for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain registrar is Ascio Technologies, Inc. The site lacks a CMS indication, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is moderate with no evident blocking or errors. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and enhanced keyboard navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data, aiding social media sharing and search engine indexing. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 52/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webstudio.team. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webstudio.team.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.