Skip to main content

Security report for webmoney.com

WebMoney Transfer · Finance · Russia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WebMoney Transfer operates as a global digital payment system providing a wide range of financial services including e-wallets, fund transfers, payment acceptance, loans, fundraising, and business management tools. The company targets both individual users and businesses, positioning itself as a comprehensive platform for online financial transactions and business support. The website content is well-structured and professionally designed, offering clear navigation and relevant information about its services. However, the technical infrastructure shows critical weaknesses, particularly in security configurations, with no valid SSL/TLS certificate and absence of modern HTTPS protocols, which poses significant risks to user data and trust. The security posture is weak, lacking essential security headers and encryption standards, which should be urgently addressed to protect users and comply with best practices. Overall, the website is functional and informative but requires immediate improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and safeguard user interactions.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of webmoney.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webmoney.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention webmoney.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
640
Employees
0
Customers
638
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
9%

9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for webmoney.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WebMoney Transfer has a strong market presence as a large financial technology entity founded in 1998, offering diversified services that include cryptocurrency support, loans, escrow, and business networking. Its ecosystem includes multiple partner domains providing complementary services such as digital goods stores, merchant directories, and authentication services. The business model revolves around facilitating secure and versatile online payments and financial operations for a global audience. The company leverages analytics tools for user behavior insights but lacks visible direct contact information on the website, which may impact customer support perception. The partnership ecosystem is robust, supporting a wide range of financial and business activities, indicating a mature and integrated service offering.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is concerning due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, exposing users to potential data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, increasing the risk of cross-site scripting and clickjacking attacks. The site does not implement DNSSEC or HSTS, further weakening domain and transport security. While no known critical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are present, the lack of modern TLS protocols and cipher suites is a critical gap. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security incident response contacts, which limits transparency and responsiveness to security issues. These factors collectively reduce the security maturity level and increase operational risk.

Recommendations

  1. Deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and cache poisoning.
  4. Activate HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  5. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide clear security incident contact channels.
  6. Add cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  7. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization for better user experience.
  8. Publish clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with integration of analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. It also employs Microsoft SignalR for real-time communication features like chat support. The site loads a large number of resources (267) and has a high page size (~550KB), resulting in slow load times (~12.6 seconds), indicating potential performance optimization opportunities. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements but lacks modern security protocols and headers. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly detected. The technical debt is evident in outdated SSL configuration and missing security best practices, which could impact user trust and operational stability. Modernization efforts should focus on security hardening, performance improvements, and enhanced privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webmoney.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webmoney.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.