Skip to main content

Security report for web.money

WebMoney Transfer · Finance · Russia

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WebMoney Transfer is a well-established international online payment system and business platform primarily targeting Russian-speaking individuals and businesses. The company offers a broad range of financial services including cryptocurrency wallets, P2P exchanges, payment acceptance, mass payouts, loans, crowdfunding, and secure transaction mechanisms such as escrow and arbitration. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism with consistent branding, comprehensive service descriptions, and integration with multiple partner and subsidiary domains. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, Google Analytics, and Microsoft SignalR for real-time features. It supports multiple platforms including iOS, Android, Windows, and MacOS, with excellent mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, secure authentication via E-NUM, and transaction protection services, though some security headers could be more explicitly declared. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for financial services, and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, WebMoney Transfer presents a trustworthy and mature digital financial ecosystem.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching web.money

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
Average
76
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WebMoney Transfer holds a significant market position in the Russian and international online payment sector, leveraging a diversified business model that includes direct payment services, cryptocurrency integration, business networking, and financial management tools. Revenue streams likely include transaction fees, credit services, and platform subscriptions. The target customer segments span private individuals, freelancers, businesses, and merchants. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem with multiple specialized service providers and marketplaces, enhancing its service portfolio and market reach. Growth indicators include extensive service offerings and active presence on major app stores and social media platforms. Strategic observations highlight the company's focus on secure, versatile financial services and digital business facilitation.

Security posture

The security maturity of WebMoney Transfer is high, with mandatory HTTPS, secure authentication via E-NUM, escrow services for transaction protection, and operational notifications to users. The site avoids exposing sensitive data and uses modern libraries with no known vulnerabilities detected in the provided content. However, explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not visible in the HTML source, which could be improved. The absence of a published incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy is a gap in transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is partially demonstrated but could be enhanced with visible cookie consent and clearer data retention policies. Overall, the security posture supports business continuity and user trust but has room for improvement in transparency and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly publish security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, including security.txt files and dedicated security contact emails.
  4. Provide explicit and easily accessible contact information including company phone numbers and support emails to improve user trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerable or privacy-invasive components are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WebMoney Transfer
Description
WebMoney Transfer — международная система расчетов и среда для ведения бизнеса в сети.
Key services
P2P exchange, Cryptocurrency wallets and services, Payment acceptance, Mass payouts, Loans and credits, Crowdfunding, Business networking, Secure transactions and arbitration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft SignalR
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android, Windows, MacOS, Huawei AppGallery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of E-NUM for secure authentication
  • Escrow service for transaction protection
  • Operation notifications
  • Access restrictions and spending limits

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Russian language targeting Russian-speaking users and businesses.
  3. Extensive service offerings in online payments, cryptocurrency, business tools, and financial services.
  4. Strong branding and consistent design across pages.
  5. Multiple official subdomains and partner sites linked.
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the main HTML content.
  7. No visible cookie consent mechanism despite GDPR compliance claims.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  9. Security features like E-NUM and Escrow indicate focus on secure transactions.
  10. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and Microsoft SignalR for real-time communication features such as chat support. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and supports multiple platforms including iOS, Android, Windows, MacOS, and Huawei AppGallery. Performance is moderate with some heavy video content but overall good user experience. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The site architecture includes multiple subdomains and partner domains, indicating a modular and scalable infrastructure. Technical risks are minimal but could include dependency on third-party analytics and potential lack of some security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with web.money. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review web.money.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.