Skip to main content

Security report for weathersunshine.com

Evaluate Dynamics s.r.o. · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WeatherSunshine.com is a specialized weather forecasting website operated by Evaluate Dynamics s.r.o., providing detailed meteorological data and forecasts for over 150,000 locations globally, with a particular focus on the Czech Republic. The site offers hourly and long-term weather outlooks, satellite and radar imagery, and weather-related news articles. It targets a broad audience including general public and weather enthusiasts, monetizing primarily through Google Adsense advertising and newsletter subscriptions. The website demonstrates consistent branding and good content quality, with clear privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR requirements. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Adsense, Tag Manager, and service workers, ensuring good mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO practices are well implemented with appropriate meta tags and structured content. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and privacy-conscious analytics settings; however, the absence of security headers and explicit incident response contacts are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency despite the website's apparent legitimacy and operational history since 2010. This discrepancy suggests possible WHOIS privacy or data unavailability rather than malicious intent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, but could enhance security transparency and domain legitimacy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weathersunshine.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the media sector, focusing on weather information services. Its competitive advantage lies in providing comprehensive, reliable weather forecasts with global coverage and localized detail, supported by satellite and radar data. The business model relies on advertising revenue and newsletter subscriptions, targeting a global user base interested in weather updates. Growth indicators include a large number of forecast locations and regular news content updates. The company maintains a clear contact and legal presence in the Czech Republic, enhancing credibility. Partnerships appear limited to advertising and analytics providers, primarily Google services. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to improve domain registration transparency and security communication to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and privacy settings for analytics and advertising demonstrate GDPR compliance. However, the absence of common security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses third-party scripts from reputable sources but should regularly audit these for security risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by adopting additional security controls and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Create and publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  3. Add explicit security or incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available or clearly justified if privacy protected.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Evaluate Dynamics s.r.o.
Registration number
IČ 29286042
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Evaluate Dynamics s.r.o.
Description
WeatherSunshine.com provides meteorological data and reliable weather forecasts for over 150,000 locations worldwide, including hourly and long-term forecasts, satellite and radar images.
Key services
Hourly and daily weather forecasts, Long-term 14 to 30-day weather outlooks, Satellite and radar imagery, Weather news and articles, Newsletter weather forecast delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google Adsense, Google Tag Manager, Google Funding Choices, JavaScript, CSS, Service Worker
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Consent management for ads and tracking
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Google Funding Choices
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides extensive weather forecast data and news articles.
  2. Clear privacy and cookie policies with consent management implemented.
  3. No phone numbers found; contact primarily via email and contact form.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, raising domain registration transparency concerns.
  5. Use of Google advertising and analytics with privacy-conscious settings.
  6. Good website design and navigation with mobile optimization.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  8. No incident response or security contact information provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Fonts for typography, Google Adsense for monetization, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and service workers for offline capabilities. The HTML is well-structured with appropriate meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph). The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by advertising scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that could impact trust and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weathersunshine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weathersunshine.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.