Skip to main content

Security report for wearesrna.org

The Siegel Rare Neuroimmune Association · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Siegel Rare Neuroimmune Association (SRNA) is an international nonprofit organization dedicated to advocating for individuals affected by rare neuroimmune disorders such as ADEM, AFM, MOGAD, NMOSD, ON, and TM. The organization focuses on education, advocacy, and accelerating research to find cures. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with multilingual support and active social media engagement. The target audience includes patients, families, healthcare professionals, and researchers. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Hotjar, and New Relic for monitoring. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but lacks some security headers and explicit incident response information. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent mechanisms but no explicit privacy policy found in the provided content. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the organization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wearesrna.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SRNA holds a strong position in the healthcare nonprofit sector, focusing on rare neuroimmune disorders. Their business model centers on advocacy, education, and research facilitation. The organization leverages digital channels effectively, including multilingual content and social media platforms, to reach a global audience. Revenue streams likely include memberships, donations, and event registrations. The website's partnership ecosystem includes Zoom for webinars and Bonfire for merchandise sales. Growth indicators include active event promotion and multilingual support. Strategic observations suggest a well-established nonprofit with a clear mission and consistent digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Incident response readiness is not publicly documented. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The use of reputable third-party services like Cloudflare DNS and New Relic monitoring adds to the security posture. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add Content-Security-Policy and other recommended security headers to harden the site against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact information, including security or abuse email addresses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Siegel Rare Neuroimmune Association
Description
SRNA is the international nonprofit advocating for individuals with rare neuroimmune disorders (ADEM | AFM | MOGAD | NMOSD | ON | TM⁣).
Key services
Advocacy, Education, Research acceleration, Membership services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Cloudflare DNS, Yoast SEO, UberMenu, Essential Grid, Events Calendar Pro, New Relic Browser monitoring
Frameworks
WordPress, Avia Framework (Enfold theme)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed nonprofit advocacy site for rare neuroimmune disorders.
  2. Content is well structured with multilingual support.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with session storage checks.
  5. Multiple social media official accounts linked.
  6. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools with moderate user tracking.
  7. Security headers could be improved for enhanced protection.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. WHOIS data indicates a legitimate and stable domain registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using the Enfold theme and Avia Framework, indicating a mature and widely supported CMS platform. The tech stack includes jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and New Relic for performance and user behavior monitoring. The site uses Cloudflare DNS services and is registered via Name.com. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices including structured data and multilingual support. Some technical debt is evident in missing security headers and limited accessibility features. The site uses multiple plugins for events, menus, and social sharing, which should be regularly updated to mitigate risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but can be improved with security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wearesrna.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wearesrna.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.