Skip to main content

Security report for waskucity.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wasku City operates as an adult content forum specializing in pornographic media sharing and community discussions. Established in 2007, it has grown to host a large volume of user-generated content including videos, pictures, and forum posts. The site targets adult users interested in diverse pornographic content and related discussions. Its business model relies on community engagement, advertising, affiliate marketing, and e-commerce sales of adult products such as sex dolls. Technically, the site runs on XenForo forum software with jQuery and Font Awesome, served over HTTPS with Cloudflare DNS but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating poor compliance with data protection regulations. No direct contact information or formal business disclosures are provided, which impacts trust and credibility. Affiliate partnerships with various adult and file sharing sites are prominent. Overall, the site is functional but has significant gaps in privacy, security, and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching waskucity.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site holds a niche position in the adult media forum market with a long operational history since 2007. Its competitive advantage lies in a large, active user base and extensive media galleries. Revenue streams include advertising, affiliate marketing with adult cam and file sharing services, and direct product sales. The target audience is adult consumers seeking free and paid pornographic content and community interaction. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple affiliate programs and related adult sites under the Wasku brand umbrella. Growth indicators include frequent new posts and media updates. However, lack of formal business transparency and compliance documentation may limit broader market acceptance.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and privacy policies exposes the site to potential risks. Forms lack visible CSRF tokens or advanced input validation. No incident response or security contact information is published. The site does not demonstrate GDPR or other regulatory compliance. These gaps increase risk of data exposure and reduce user trust. No critical vulnerabilities were detected in the visible content, but the lack of security best practices is notable.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC and implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Add terms of service and clearly visible contact information including security and abuse contacts.
  4. Improve form security with CSRF tokens and input validation to prevent injection attacks.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online adult forum focused on pornographic content sharing including videos, pictures, and discussions.
Key services
Pornographic video and picture downloads, Discussion forums, Media galleries, Affiliate marketing and advertising, Sex doll product sales
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, XenForo forum software, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
XenForo
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AsianSexDiary affiliate, Chaturbate affiliate, TrikePatrol affiliate, TukTukPatrol affiliate
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content forum with extensive user-generated pornographic media and discussions.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found on the site.
  3. Site uses XenForo forum software with jQuery and Font Awesome.
  4. HTTPS is enabled but no advanced security headers detected.
  5. WHOIS data shows domain is old and registered with NameCheap, no privacy protection.
  6. Multiple external affiliate and partner links to adult and file sharing sites.
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  8. Site requests registration via a Bitcoin payment link.
  9. No visible GDPR or data protection compliance indicators.
  10. Site content is accessible without WAF or blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a mature forum platform (XenForo) with legacy jQuery 1.11.0 and Font Awesome 4.7.0, indicating some technical debt. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness and SEO meta tags present. Hosting details are unclear but Cloudflare DNS is used. The site lacks modern accessibility features and advanced SEO optimizations. There is opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance accessibility compliance to improve user experience and search rankings.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with waskucity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review waskucity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.