Skip to main content

Security report for warontherocks.com

Metamorphic Media · Media · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

War on the Rocks is a well-established media platform founded in 2013, specializing in analysis, commentary, and multimedia content on foreign policy and national security through a realist perspective. It targets policymakers, military leaders, and strategic thinkers, offering both free and members-only content. The platform leverages a membership business model supplemented by advertising revenue. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Memberful for membership management. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, providing an excellent user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and some best practices like rel attributes on external links but lacks DNSSEC, Content Security Policy headers, and published security policies or incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and terms pages present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but could improve security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching warontherocks.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

War on the Rocks occupies a niche in the national security media sector, serving a specialized audience of insiders and policymakers. Its competitive advantage lies in authoritative content and a membership model that provides exclusive insights. Revenue streams include memberships and advertising partnerships with major ad networks. The platform maintains a strong presence on social media and uses advanced marketing tools like Drip and Memberful. Growth indicators include consistent content updates and diversified content types such as podcasts and special series. The partnership ecosystem includes Memberful for subscriptions and various analytics and advertising services. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing security posture and privacy compliance to maintain trust and meet evolving regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and some security best practices in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC, Content Security Policy, and a published security.txt or incident response contacts indicates gaps in security governance and vulnerability management. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security reviews. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance gaps related to GDPR cookie consent mechanisms are present. The security culture appears to prioritize user experience and marketing integration but should enhance transparency and technical controls to mitigate risks effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement a robust Content Security Policy (CSP) to reduce risks from cross-site scripting and other code injection attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and integrations to minimize privacy and security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Metamorphic Media
Description
A platform for analysis, commentary, debate and multimedia content on foreign policy and national security issues through a realist lens.
Key services
Analysis articles, Commentary, Debate, Podcasts, Multimedia content, Membership access
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Drip (email marketing), Memberful (membership management), FontAwesome, Cloudflare (implied by origin-trial headers)
Frameworks
Yoast SEO Premium
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of rel="noopener noreferrer" on external links with target="_blank"
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security related meta tags (X-UA-Compatible)
  • Use of origin-trial headers for WebViewXRequestWithDeprecation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager (DoubleClick), Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Plausible Analytics, Drip
Marketing tools
Drip email marketing, Memberful membership platform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional media platform focused on national security and foreign policy analysis.
  2. Content is well-structured with clear navigation and membership options.
  3. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts published.
  6. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress CMS platform with a modern and responsive design optimized for mobile devices. It uses a combination of popular JavaScript libraries and marketing/analytics tools, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Drip, and Memberful. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts and asynchronous loading of scripts to enhance speed. SEO is well-implemented with Yoast SEO Premium and comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party services and lack of advanced security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and improve privacy compliance to reduce technical debt and enhance resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with warontherocks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review warontherocks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.