Skip to main content

Security report for wandp.cz

W&P - member of Euronova Group · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

W&P, a member of the Euronova Group, is a leading outdoor advertising provider in the western Czech Republic, offering a broad portfolio of advertising spaces including billboards, public transport shelters, LED screens, and more. The company holds a significant market share in the Plzeň and Karlovy Vary regions and emphasizes community benefit alongside business growth. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using popular page builders and plugins, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented, but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and business information appear professional and credible. Overall, the site is well-structured and compliant with GDPR, with clear contact information and social media presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wandp.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wandp.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for wandp.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

W&P operates in the media sector specializing in outdoor advertising, targeting businesses seeking advertising solutions in western Czech regions. Its integration into the Euronova Group strengthens its market position. The business model revolves around owning and managing advertising media spaces and providing comprehensive advertising campaigns. The company leverages digital marketing tools like Google Analytics and maintains a professional online presence. Growth indicators include a dominant market share and a broad portfolio of advertising formats. Partnerships are implied with Euronova Group and social media platforms. Strategic observations suggest a focus on regional dominance and community engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place, indicating GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency in security management. The use of multiple WordPress plugins and page builders increases the attack surface, necessitating regular updates and monitoring. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with enhanced headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  4. Add incident response contact information to facilitate reporting and handling of security incidents.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
VAT number
CZ40526526
Registration number
405 26 526
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
W&P - member of Euronova Group
Description
W&P offers a wide portfolio of quality outdoor advertising spaces, providing comprehensive and connected offers with professional service. As part of the Euronova group, it holds a market share of up to 70% in outdoor advertising in the Plzeň and Karlovy Vary regions. The company emphasizes community benefit and positive societal contribution.
Key services
Billboards, BigBoards, Navigation advertising, Bridges advertising, Advertising tarps, City Light Posters (CLV), Public transport shelters, Poster Cubes, LED screens, Benches advertising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder, Elementor, Google Fonts, Google Maps API
Frameworks
WPBakery, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may indicate privacy protection or registration issues
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  5. Uses multiple WordPress page builders and plugins, increasing attack surface if not maintained
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram
  7. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
  8. Contact information is clearly presented in footer
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a combination of WPBakery Page Builder and Elementor, indicating a flexible but potentially complex front-end architecture. It uses popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and integrates Slider Revolution for dynamic content. Google Fonts and Google Maps API are used for styling and location services. The site is served over HTTPS with valid SSL certificates, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. The technical stack is modern but requires diligent maintenance due to multiple plugins and frameworks in use.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wandp.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wandp.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.