Nelonen Media Live Oy · Media · Finland
Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.
Wanaja Festival is a well-established Finnish music festival organized by Nelonen Media Live Oy, a subsidiary of the Sanoma group. The festival is held annually in Hämeenlinna and features prominent domestic artists, targeting a Finnish-speaking audience interested in cultural and music events. The website serves as a comprehensive platform for event information, ticket sales, artist lineups, and news updates, reflecting a mature and professional digital presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrations such as Yoast SEO, Instagram Feed, and Adobe DTM for tag management. It uses HTTPS with no detected security warnings, indicating a secure infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features, although there is room for improvement in security headers and accessibility compliance. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices including encrypted connections, privacy management scripts, and cookie consent mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents a low risk profile with strong business credibility and compliance with GDPR. Strategically, the festival benefits from strong partnerships and sponsorships, enhancing its market position. The website effectively supports business goals through clear navigation, quality content, and integrated marketing tools. Continued focus on security enhancements and accessibility will further strengthen the platform.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
SPF helps prevent email spoofing
What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"
DMARC provides email authentication and reporting
What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention wanajafestival.fi, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for wanajafestival.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with wanajafestival.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wanajafestival.fi.