Skip to main content

Security report for wallester.com

Wallester · Finance · Estonia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wallester is a fintech company specializing in providing multi-currency IBAN business accounts, card issuing, and expense management solutions tailored for businesses and freelancers. The company also offers a White-Label banking platform with API integration for EEA and UK markets, positioning itself as a versatile embedded finance provider. Their market position is strengthened by regulatory licensing in Estonia, Visa Principal membership, and PCI DSS Level 1 certification, supported by strong trust indicators and positive user reviews. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React and Lottie animations, hosted on Cloudflare with good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is robust with HTTPS, security headers, and secure cookie practices, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, with room for improvement in publishing dedicated security and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wallester.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
49
Security headers
80
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wallester.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
252
Employees
0
Customers
207
Third parties
45
Weak passwords
19%

10 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for wallester.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate wallester.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
16
Registered
16
Resolving
16
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • wa•••••••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • wa•••••••.comMediumhomoglyph
  • wa•••••••.comMediumhomoglyph

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of wallester.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Wallester operates in the finance sector, targeting businesses, freelancers, and FinTech partners with embedded finance and white-label solutions. Their business model revolves around providing banking-as-a-service (BaaS) capabilities including account management, card issuance, and spend control via APIs. The company demonstrates growth and market credibility through partnerships with Visa and regulatory compliance in Estonia. Their ecosystem includes integrations with accounting software and payment platforms, enhancing their competitive advantage. The company maintains a strong media presence and positive customer feedback, indicating a healthy market position and strategic partnerships. Revenue streams likely include account fees, card issuance fees, and platform licensing for white-label services.

Security posture

Wallester exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, comprehensive security headers, and PCI DSS Level 1 certification. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds protection against unauthorized transfers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. The company should consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt to enhance security communication and incident handling readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy outlining security practices and controls.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure or bug bounty program.
  5. Enhance transparency by adding a security.txt file at the root domain.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wallester
Description
Wallester provides multi-currency IBAN business accounts, payment services, invoicing, card issuing, and spend control solutions for businesses and freelancers. They also offer a White-Label banking platform for accounts and card issuing with a single API for EEA and UK coverage.
Key services
Multi-currency IBAN business accounts, Card issuing (virtual, debit, prepaid, credit), Expense management, White-Label banking platform, API for embedded finance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React, Lottie animations, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure cookie attributes (Secure, SameSite=Lax)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Bing Ads, Quora Events
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Bing Ads, Quora Events
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong regulatory and certification trust signals present.
  3. Comprehensive multi-language support indicated by hreflang tags.
  4. Modern frontend technologies and good SEO practices implemented.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact primarily via forms.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts published.
  7. Good use of analytics and marketing tools with consent management.
  8. Domain registration and website content are consistent and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend technologies including React and Lottie for animations, ensuring a rich user experience. Hosting via Cloudflare provides performance and security benefits. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with proper meta tags and hreflang for internationalization. Analytics and marketing tools are integrated with consent management, balancing tracking and privacy. No technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to improve DNS security and publish more comprehensive security documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wallester.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wallester.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.