Skip to main content

Security report for wallaciacountryclub.com.au

Wallacia Country Club · Hospitality · Australia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wallacia Country Club is a community-focused hospitality and recreational club based in Australia, offering services such as dining, entertainment, golf, and membership benefits. The website positions the club as a central hub for local community engagement with a variety of facilities and events. The business model revolves around membership and providing leisure services to members and visitors. The site is built on a WordPress platform with modern technologies including Yoast SEO, UIkit framework, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The website is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with Australian domain norms, though WHOIS data is minimal due to privacy policies. The site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wallaciacountryclub.com.au

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Wallacia Country Club operates in the hospitality sector, targeting local community members and visitors interested in recreational activities such as golf and dining. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive membership benefits, diverse facilities, and community engagement through events and promotions. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, dining and bar sales, event hosting, and golf-related services. The club maintains partnerships with several related local clubs and accommodation providers, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include active promotions and online membership renewal options. The website content and structure reflect a stable and established operation with a focus on member services and community presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms, reducing spam and automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the club to regulatory risks. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with better policy disclosures and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve regulatory compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wallacia Country Club
Description
The Heart of Wallacia
Key services
Dining, Promotions, Entertainment, Golf, Membership services, Facilities rental and accommodation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, UIkit, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
UIkit
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Google Tag Manager and Analytics scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and multiple service offerings.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected, which is a compliance gap.
  4. WHOIS data is minimal due to .au domain privacy policies.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO plugins.
  6. Presence of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates tracking but no explicit cookie consent mechanism.
  7. Contact information includes phone number, physical address, and Facebook link.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No forms with visible input fields detected in the HTML content provided.
  10. No explicit incident response or security policy information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with the Yoast SEO plugin, leveraging the UIkit framework for UI components and responsiveness. It uses jQuery and asynchronous loading of Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts, indicating a modern and performance-conscious setup. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and good navigation clarity. However, no hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and asset optimization. The technical stack is standard for hospitality websites, providing a balance of functionality and ease of maintenance. Opportunities exist to modernize further by adopting newer JavaScript frameworks or enhancing accessibility and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wallaciacountryclub.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wallaciacountryclub.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.