Skip to main content

Security report for walkinthesky.pl

Walk In The Sky · Hospitality · Poland

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Walk In The Sky is a small Polish experiential business offering a unique extreme urban adventure where participants walk down the vertical facade of buildings in Warsaw and Łódź. The company targets thrill-seekers and gift buyers with options including filming and vouchers. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, supported by modern but somewhat dated technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, though lacking some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is functional, trustworthy, and well-positioned within its niche market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching walkinthesky.pl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector focusing on extreme adventure experiences. Its business model revolves around selling unique urban adventure activities and gift vouchers, leveraging partnerships such as wyjatkowyprezent.pl for voucher sales. The target audience includes adventure seekers and gift purchasers in Poland, primarily in Warsaw and Łódź. The company maintains a consistent brand presence with customer testimonials and active social media channels. The use of privacy protection in domain registration is typical for small businesses and does not raise significant concerns. The business appears stable but small in scale, with opportunities for growth through enhanced digital marketing and security improvements.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no visible security or incident response policy. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files suggests limited formal security governance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing security headers, formal policies, and regular security audits to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen security posture.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all users.
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user behavior and improve marketing effectiveness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Walk In The Sky
Description
Walk In The Sky offers an extreme adventure experience where participants walk down the vertical facade of a building, secured with special equipment. The experience is available in Warsaw and Łódź, Poland, and can be booked with or without filming, for one or two persons. It targets thrill-seekers and people looking to overcome fear through a unique urban extreme activity.
Key services
Extreme urban adventure experience (walking down building facade), Experience vouchers (gift vouchers), Filming options for the experience
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, Bootstrap 3.3.5, Bootstrap-select, SweetAlert, Fancybox, Google reCAPTCHA v2, LESS CSS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. The site offers a niche extreme adventure experience in Poland.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and email.
  6. Use of modern but somewhat dated JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.11.3).
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No analytics services explicitly detected.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and Google Plus.
  10. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic web technology stack with Bootstrap 3.3.5 and jQuery 1.11.3, which are stable but somewhat outdated. The presence of LESS CSS indicates a preprocessor usage for styles. Google reCAPTCHA v2 is used for spam protection on forms. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization techniques detected. The CMS is not identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting provider details are not available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for the business scale but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with walkinthesky.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review walkinthesky.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.