Skip to main content

Security report for waikatotimes.co.nz

Stuff · Media · New Zealand

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Waikato Times website serves as a regional news platform for the Waikato area in New Zealand and is part of the larger Stuff media group. It offers news content, subscription services, and advertising opportunities targeting local residents and readers interested in regional news. The website's market position is that of a regional news provider under a reputable national media company. Technically, the site uses modern web frameworks such as Ionic and React, integrates multiple third-party analytics and advertising services, and supports mobile optimization. However, the content snapshot suggests a loading state with minimal visible content in the provided HTML. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partially met with a comprehensive privacy policy but no detected cookie consent mechanism. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, although the association with Stuff supports legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching waikatotimes.co.nz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
92
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Waikato Times operates within the media sector as a regional news outlet under the Stuff brand, leveraging advertising and subscription revenue models. Its competitive advantage lies in its local focus combined with the backing of a large media company. The target audience includes residents of the Waikato region and those interested in local news. The website ecosystem includes multiple advertising partners and analytics providers, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. Growth potential is tied to digital subscriptions and advertising effectiveness. The partnership with Stuff provides brand strength and operational support. Strategic observations suggest a need to enhance privacy compliance and security transparency to maintain user trust and regulatory alignment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security or incident response policies were found, and there is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. The presence of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations given the extensive use of tracking scripts.
  3. Publish explicit security policies and incident response procedures to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and advertising partners to mitigate supply chain risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stuff
Description
The Waikato Times is a regional news website providing news and information for the Waikato region in New Zealand. It is part of Stuff, a major New Zealand media company.
Key services
News reporting, Subscription services, Advertising
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Ionic Framework, ReactJS, New Relic, Google Identity Services, Piano (subscription/paywall), Nielsen Analytics, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Ionic, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Nielsen Analytics, Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Google AdSense, Outbrain, Index Exchange, AppNexus (prebid.adnxs.com), GumGum, Teads, Xandr, Rubicon Project, Criteo, Casale Media, OpenX, Kargo, PubMatic
Tracking pixels
Nielsen Analytics, Outbrain, AmplifyPixel
Marketing tools
Piano (subscription/paywall)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trust score.
  3. Website uses multiple third-party ad and tracking services.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite tracking scripts.
  5. Privacy and terms policies are linked and appear comprehensive.
  6. Contact information includes a valid company email and phone number.
  7. Website content is minimal in the provided HTML snapshot, likely a loading state.
  8. Technical stack includes modern frameworks and analytics tools.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including the Ionic framework and ReactJS, indicating a contemporary front-end architecture optimized for mobile and desktop. Integration with New Relic suggests performance monitoring is in place. The use of multiple advertising and analytics services reflects a complex digital marketing infrastructure. However, the provided HTML snapshot shows a loading skeleton state, indicating dynamic content loading which may impact initial user experience and SEO if not optimized. The absence of CMS identification suggests a custom or proprietary content management solution. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and SEO optimization. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced performance tuning and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with waikatotimes.co.nz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review waikatotimes.co.nz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.