Skip to main content

Security report for waerme.li

LIECHTENSTEIN WÄRME · Energy · Liechtenstein

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LIECHTENSTEIN WÄRME is the second largest energy provider in Liechtenstein, focusing on the transition to green energy and sustainable heating solutions. Their services include natural gas supply, local and district heating, and customer service tailored to regional needs. The company aligns with national energy strategies for 2030 and 2050, emphasizing sustainability and responsibility. The website is professionally designed using TYPO3 CMS, featuring modern frontend components and a clear navigation structure. While the site is accessible and secure with HTTPS, it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners. No incident response or security policies are publicly disclosed, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the site presents a credible and professional image with good content quality and technical implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching waerme.li

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a key energy supplier in Liechtenstein, targeting both residential and commercial customers interested in sustainable energy solutions. Their business model revolves around providing green energy and heating services aligned with governmental energy visions. The presence of corporate governance and published annual reports indicates transparency and regulatory compliance. The website's partnership with a local TYPO3 agency suggests a stable digital ecosystem. However, the absence of visible social media presence and limited contact channels may restrict broader customer engagement. Growth potential lies in expanding digital services and enhancing compliance visibility.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption, ensuring secure data transmission. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No forms or input fields are present on the main page, minimizing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which is a gap in security transparency. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers, cookie consent, and public security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to build trust and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet modern standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LIECHTENSTEIN WÄRME
Description
Wir treiben als Unternehmen die Transformation zielstrebig in Richtung Grüne Energie voran. Das zweitgrösste Energieversorgungsunternehmen Liechtensteins steht für Nachhaltigkeit, Verantwortung, Verlässlichkeit und verfolgt die Ziele der Energiestrategie 2030 und Energievision 2050.
Key services
Erdgasversorgung, Nah- & Fernwärme, Kundenservice, Nachhaltige Energieversorgung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery (implied by slick slider usage), Slick Slider
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and relevant to the energy sector in Liechtenstein.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  4. No visible security headers detected in provided data; potential area for improvement.
  5. No forms detected on the main page; contact information limited to physical address and links to contact page.
  6. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  7. Website uses TYPO3 CMS with modern frontend libraries like slick slider.
  8. No explicit incident response or security policy information found.
  9. Published annual report and corporate governance pages indicate transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, supported by modern JavaScript libraries such as slick slider for UI components. The site loads multiple compressed JavaScript and CSS assets, indicating optimization efforts. Mobile responsiveness is good, with viewport meta tags and adaptive image loading. SEO is supported by canonical links and meta descriptions. However, no advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. Hosting details are not explicit, but the presence of Liechtenstein-based agency references suggests local hosting or management. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with waerme.li. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review waerme.li.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.