Skip to main content

Security report for vvconstruction.lv

VV Construction, SIA · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VV Construction, SIA is a Latvian construction company established in 2011, specializing in civil and residential finishing, reconstruction, and renovation works. The company targets private individuals and businesses in Latvia, offering a comprehensive range of construction and repair services. The website presents a professional portfolio with project galleries and clear contact information, supporting its market position as a reliable local construction service provider. Technically, the website is built on the Mono CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries, Google Analytics with IP anonymization, hCaptcha for form security, and Hotjar for user behavior analysis. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and consent mechanisms for cookies, but lacks explicit security headers and detailed security policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, suitable for its business purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vvconstruction.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector, focusing on construction and renovation services in Latvia. Its business model revolves around providing general and subcontracted construction works, including interior finishing, exterior works, and specialized tasks like electrical and plumbing installations. The website demonstrates a solid project portfolio with recent and past works, indicating steady business activity and client trust. The company leverages partnerships with general contractors and serves both private and commercial clients. The presence of a privacy policy and cookie consent reflects awareness of regulatory compliance. The absence of social media links suggests a focus on direct client engagement rather than broad digital marketing. The company is small-sized but well-established with over a decade of experience.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration, uses hCaptcha to protect forms from bots, and implements cookie consent with opt-in/out options, indicating a mature approach to user privacy and security. Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization, reducing privacy risks. However, the site lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adding security headers and formalizing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding social media presence or digital marketing channels to expand market reach and brand visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA VV Construction
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VV Construction, SIA
Description
Sertificēts būvniecības uzņēmums SIA “VV Construction” tika dibināts 2011. gadā. Piedāvā būvdarbus, celtniecības darbus, dzīvokļu un privātmāju kapitālo remontu.
Key services
Iekšējie apdares darbi (interior finishing), Ārējie un vispārceltnieciskie darbi (exterior and general construction works), Celtniecības darbi (construction works), Remonta darbi (repair works), Dzīvokļu un privātmāju kapitālais remonts (apartment and private house renovations)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, hCaptcha, Hotjar, FontAwesome, CSS Fonts CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Use of hCaptcha for forms
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about construction services.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented with consent mechanisms.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools with IP anonymization.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Contact information is clear and consistent with business operations.
  8. Website built on Mono CMS platform with multiple external CDNs and scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Mono CMS platform, leveraging multiple external CDNs for fonts, scripts, and stylesheets. It uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site loads multiple deferred scripts to optimize performance and includes hCaptcha for form security. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by reducing external dependencies and optimizing image loading. Accessibility is basic, with room for enhancements in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vvconstruction.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vvconstruction.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.