Skip to main content

Security report for vultisig.com

Vulti Holdings Limited · Finance · British Virgin Islands

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vultisig is a newly launched cryptocurrency wallet provider specializing in multi-factor, seedless security using Threshold Signature Scheme (TSS) technology. The company, operating under Vulti Holdings Limited based in the British Virgin Islands, offers a multi-chain wallet supporting over 30 blockchains including Bitcoin and Ethereum. Their product targets crypto users seeking enhanced security without the traditional risks of seed phrase management. The website presents a professional and modern interface with clear messaging about security and usability. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Next.js and Cloudflare DNS, and supports multiple platforms including web, Android, iOS, and Windows. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, multi-factor authentication, and domain protection status flags, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are not published. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned for its niche but should improve transparency on privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vultisig.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Vultisig positions itself as an innovative player in the crypto wallet market by eliminating seed phrases and leveraging TSS for multi-signature security. Their business model focuses on self-custodial wallets with multi-factor authentication, appealing to both individual users and DAOs. The company has established partnerships with recognized blockchain projects such as DeFi Suisse, THORChain, and Rujira, enhancing credibility. The startup nature is reflected in the recent domain registration and product launch. Revenue streams likely include wallet usage and possibly token incentives ($VULT airdrop mentioned). The company targets crypto investors and DeFi users who prioritize security and ease of use. Growth indicators include active user testimonials and a high aggregate rating. The partnership ecosystem and open-source audit claims further strengthen market positioning.

Security posture

Vultisig demonstrates a mature security approach by integrating multi-factor authentication and TSS technology to mitigate single points of failure common in crypto wallets. The website enforces HTTPS and domain status protections, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers documentation. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and readiness perception. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could expose compliance risks under GDPR or similar regulations. Overall, the security posture is strong technologically but could benefit from improved policy transparency and formal incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Implement and document security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vulti Holdings Limited
Description
Revolutionary multi-factor crypto wallet with TSS technology. Secure Bitcoin, Ethereum, and 30+ chains without seed phrases. No single point of failure.
Key services
Multi-signature wallet, TSS technology, Support for 30+ blockchains, Seedless security, Self-custodial wallet, Multi-factor authentication
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Cloudflare DNS, JavaScript, CSS, HTML
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web, Android, iOS, Windows
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of multi-factor authentication
  • Seedless private key design
  • No seed phrases stored or required
  • Use of Threshold Signature Scheme (TSS)
  • ClientDeleteProhibited and other domain status flags set

Analytics and tracking

Services
Markfi Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Markfi Analytics
Marketing tools
Markfi Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with modern UI and UX.
  2. Strong focus on security and innovative crypto wallet technology.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page.
  4. Contact email is provided and consistent with company domain.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses found on main page.
  6. Use of multiple external analytics and ad scripts.
  7. Domain is very new but consistent with startup launch.
  8. No signs of phishing or malware detected.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  10. No explicit GDPR compliance statements found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework (Next.js) with Cloudflare DNS services, ensuring good performance and scalability. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with a clean, professional design. External scripts include analytics and advertising tools such as Markfi Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Twitter Ads, indicating moderate user tracking. The domain is newly registered but properly configured with registrar protections. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. Performance is moderate with preloading optimizations and asynchronous script loading. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and incomplete security header implementation, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vultisig.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vultisig.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.