Skip to main content

Security report for vtdigger.org

VTDigger · Media · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VTDigger is a well-established, member-supported news organization focused on Vermont, providing comprehensive coverage of business, politics, environment, and public policy since 2009. The website demonstrates a strong market position as Vermont's largest newsroom, with a professional and consistent brand presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrations such as Gravity Forms, WooCommerce, and Google Analytics, hosted with reputable providers and using Cloudflare DNS. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, offering a good user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain protections, though it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is limited by the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, which should be addressed to improve trust and regulatory adherence. Overall, the site is credible and trustworthy with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vtdigger.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VTDigger operates in the media sector, targeting Vermont residents and stakeholders interested in local news and investigative journalism. Its business model relies on member support and donations, with additional revenue from advertising and merchandise sales. The organization leverages digital channels including newsletters, podcasts, and social media to engage its audience. The domain age and WHOIS privacy protection align with standard practices for media entities, supporting legitimacy. The site’s technical infrastructure and marketing tools indicate a mature digital presence, though explicit business contact details are limited to web forms, which may affect direct engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS, enhancing transport security and DNS reliability. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site uses secure forms via Gravity Forms but lacks published security policies or incident response contacts, which are important for transparency and trust. The use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts introduces moderate tracking, which should be balanced with privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but can be strengthened with additional controls and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Provide explicit security and incident response policies, including contact channels for reporting vulnerabilities or abuse.
  5. Review and optimize third-party tracking to align with privacy best practices and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VTDigger
Description
Vermont's largest newsroom. Reporting on Vermont business, politics, the environment, public policy and more since 2009.
Key services
News reporting, Investigative journalism, Podcasts, Newsletters
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, WooCommerce, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, OneSignal Push Notifications, Broadstreet Ads, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Quantcast, WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Broadstreet Ads, Google Ad Manager
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Quantcast
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit, OneSignal Push Notifications
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional news media site focused on Vermont.
  2. Content is rich and well-structured with multiple sections and social media integration.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found in the provided content.
  4. Contact is primarily via contact forms; no explicit emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. Security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and policies.
  7. Advertising and tracking are present but standard for media sites.
  8. WHOIS data shows privacy protection but domain age and registrar are consistent with legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Gravity Forms for form handling, WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, and integration with Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. Hosting and DNS are managed via GoDaddy and Cloudflare, respectively. Performance is moderate with some optimizations such as font preloading and lazy loading evident. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with SEO enhancements via Yoast SEO plugin. Technical debt appears low, but enabling DNSSEC and additional security headers would modernize the security posture. The presence of multiple advertising and tracking scripts suggests a need for careful management of privacy and performance impacts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vtdigger.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vtdigger.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.