Skip to main content

Security report for vrv.cz

VRV · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VRV is a Czech Republic based company focused on modern water management and environmental sustainability. The website presents a professional image with a clear business focus on water-related services and protection of the environment. The company targets stakeholders in the water management sector within the Czech Republic. The website is built using Webflow, leveraging modern web technologies and fonts, and includes a cookie consent mechanism indicating some privacy awareness. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of explicit privacy and security policies limit the overall trust and compliance posture. Security headers and advanced security practices are not evident, and no direct contact information or social media links were found in the analyzed content. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in transparency and security compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vrv.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VRV operates in the energy sector with a specialization in water management and environmental protection in the Czech Republic. The business model appears service-oriented, focusing on sustainable water infrastructure development. The company maintains a modern digital presence with a well-designed website but lacks publicly available WHOIS registration details, which may affect trust. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The absence of detailed contact information and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in customer engagement and regulatory compliance. The company’s market position is that of a modern water management builder with emphasis on sustainability.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, which are positive security indicators. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-XSS-Protection were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The lack of explicit privacy and security policies, absence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts, and no visible analytics or tracking scripts reduce the security maturity level. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises questions about domain registration transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, policies, and transparency to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer trust.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VRV
Description
Budujeme moderní vodohospodářství v ČR s důrazem na udržitelnost a ochranu životního prostředí.
Key services
Water management services, Environmental protection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, jQuery, WebFont Loader, Finsweet CMS Nest, CookieConsent
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Webflow with modern design and good user experience.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which limits domain trust assessment.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented indicating some privacy awareness.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  7. No security headers or advanced security practices detected in the HTML content.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly detected beyond Webflow and Google Fonts.
  9. Content is professional and focused on water management and environmental sustainability in Czech Republic.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing Google Fonts and several JavaScript libraries including WebFont Loader and Finsweet CMS Nest. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no advanced analytics or tracking services were detected. The site lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or compliance frameworks. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vrv.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vrv.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.