Skip to main content

Security report for vroomagazine.com

solidpixels. · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VROOMAGAZINE.com is an online lifestyle and travel magazine targeting discerning men aged 30 and above, focusing on travel, gear, lifestyle, mobility, business, and finance. The website is professionally designed, with a consistent brand presence and rich editorial content in Czech. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and a proprietary CMS platform (solidpixels.). The site is mobile optimized and uses interactive elements like sliders and lightboxes to enhance user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the site is functional, professional, and trustworthy but could improve transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vroomagazine.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vroomagazine.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for vroomagazine.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a niche media publisher focusing on premium lifestyle content for an affluent, mature audience. Its market position is that of a specialized magazine offering travel guides, product reviews, and lifestyle articles. The business model is content-driven, likely monetized through advertising and partnerships. The company behind the site is solidpixels., which appears to be a digital agency or CMS provider. The lack of explicit contact information and company registration details on the site limits direct business intelligence. The site integrates with major ad networks and tracking platforms, indicating a focus on digital marketing and audience analytics.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. It uses common tracking and marketing scripts but does not expose vulnerable libraries or insecure forms visibly. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or security policy information is available, which limits assessment of preparedness. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the site is secure for typical user interactions but could enhance security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to ensure domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Establish and communicate an incident response plan and security policy to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
solidpixels.
Description
VROOMAGAZINE.com is a lifestyle and travel media platform targeting discerning men aged 30+, focusing on travel, design, architecture, gastronomy, fashion, mobility, business, and finance.
Key services
Editorial content, Travel guides, Product reviews, Lifestyle articles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery (possibly), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, Solidpixels CMS, Swiper.js slider, Fancybox lightbox, AOS animations
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (implied)
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered in the queried WHOIS server.
  4. Website uses modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  8. Content is focused on lifestyle, travel, gear, and business topics targeting mature audience.
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the solidpixels. CMS platform, using modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for sliders and Fancybox for lightboxes. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vroomagazine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vroomagazine.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.