Skip to main content

Security report for vrm-datenschutz.de

VRM Holding GmbH & Co. KG · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VRM Datenschutz website serves as a centralized privacy information portal for the VRM media group, a large regional media company in Germany. The site provides links to privacy notices for various digital offerings including news portals, e-paper services, and subscription shops. The business operates primarily in the media sector, targeting users of its digital content platforms. The website content is basic but consistent with the company's branding and provides essential privacy information in German. Technically, the site is hosted by Versatel and lacks modern security configurations such as HTTPS, security headers, and DNS security extensions. Performance is slow with a load time exceeding 10 seconds, and mobile optimization is minimal but functional. Security posture is weak due to the absence of SSL/TLS and security headers, exposing the site to potential risks. Privacy compliance is partially met with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate business credibility but requires significant improvements in security and technical implementation to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vrm-datenschutz.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VRM Holding GmbH & Co. KG operates multiple digital media platforms serving regional audiences in Germany. Their business model centers on digital content distribution, subscription services, and media sales. The company maintains a portfolio of news portals and e-paper offerings, indicating a diversified digital media presence. Market positioning is regional with a focus on local news and media sales in Mittelhessen and Rhein-Main regions. The website reflects a straightforward approach to privacy communication but lacks advanced digital marketing or tracking technologies. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries beyond the listed digital offerings are identified. The company appears to prioritize compliance with GDPR through dedicated privacy notices but has not implemented comprehensive cookie management or incident response disclosures.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low, primarily due to the lack of HTTPS and valid SSL/TLS certificates, which is a critical vulnerability. Absence of security headers and DNS security mechanisms further weakens the security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The lack of cookie consent and tracking transparency may pose compliance risks under GDPR. No forms or user input mechanisms reduce the attack surface but also limit user engagement. Overall, the site requires urgent implementation of HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance mechanisms to mitigate risks and improve trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate immediately to secure data transmission.
  2. Configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  5. Improve website performance and mobile optimization to enhance user experience and SEO.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Versatel DNS servers with a single IPv4 address and no DNSSEC or CAA records configured. SSL/TLS is not enabled, and no modern TLS protocols or cipher suites are supported. The site uses basic HTML5 with a linked CSS stylesheet but no JavaScript libraries or frameworks detected. Performance is slow with a load time over 10 seconds and a small page size. Mobile viewport meta tag is present but no advanced accessibility or SEO features are implemented. The site lacks analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal data collection. Overall, the technical infrastructure is basic and requires modernization to meet current web standards and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vrm-datenschutz.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vrm-datenschutz.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.