Skip to main content

Security report for vriendenumcutrecht-wkz.nl

Vrienden UMC Utrecht & Wilhelmina Kinderziekenhuis · Healthcare · Netherlands

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vrienden UMC Utrecht & Wilhelmina Kinderziekenhuis is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting the UMC Utrecht hospital and its Wilhelmina Children's Hospital through fundraising efforts. The website serves as a platform to engage donors and supporters, emphasizing child-friendly and comfortable hospital care. The organization positions itself as a charitable entity focused on enhancing medical research and patient experience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern technologies such as Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is well-structured with SEO optimizations and mobile responsiveness, providing a good user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses DNSSEC, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, but lacks explicit security policies or incident response information. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid security posture and compliance with privacy regulations through Cookiebot, though it could improve transparency by publishing privacy and terms of service documents and providing direct contact information. The domain registration data is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the organization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vriendenumcutrecht-wkz.nl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, focusing on fundraising for hospital research and patient comfort. Its business model relies on donations and community engagement, targeting patients, families, and donors. The website reflects a consistent brand identity and professional content quality, with a clear mission and audience. The use of social media, particularly Twitter, supports outreach efforts. The absence of direct contact details and formal policies suggests room for growth in transparency and stakeholder communication. The domain age and registrar information align with the organization's profile, indicating a stable and legitimate online presence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enabled, DNSSEC active, and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the site lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for comprehensive security governance. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. Security headers beyond DNSSEC and HTTPS are not explicitly mentioned, suggesting potential improvements. Overall, the site is secure but could enhance its security maturity by publishing policies and providing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide direct contact information for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vrienden UMC Utrecht & Wilhelmina Kinderziekenhuis
Description
De beste zorg en behandeling. In een kindvriendelijke en comfortabele omgeving. Daar zetten wij ons voor in. Helpt u mee?
Key services
Fundraising for medical research, Financing extra hospital facilities, Supporting child-friendly and comfortable hospital environment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, FoundationPress theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Meta Platforms (Facebook)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit fundraising platform for a Dutch hospital
  2. Uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS
  3. Implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent via Cookiebot
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  5. Contact information limited to subscription form; no direct emails or phone numbers found
  6. Good SEO and structured data implementation
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected
  9. Social media presence includes Twitter handle @VriendenUMCUWKZ
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a child theme of FoundationPress, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. It uses Gravity Forms for form handling and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and hosts assets on its domain. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is well addressed with Yoast SEO plugin metadata and structured JSON-LD data. Hosting is likely provided by Antagonist B.V., consistent with the registrar information. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design. Technical risks are minimal, but the absence of some security headers and formal policies indicates areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vriendenumcutrecht-wkz.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vriendenumcutrecht-wkz.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.