Skip to main content

Security report for vpa.net

Virginia Press Association · Media · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Virginia Press Association (VPA) is a longstanding media association dedicated to supporting newspapers in Virginia through advocacy, membership services, advertising, and professional development. Established in 1881, the VPA positions itself as a key regional organization championing free press ideals and providing resources to its members. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Bootstrap, Amazon Polly, and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating a moderate to advanced technical infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and incident response information. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, serving its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vpa.net

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VPA operates as a membership-based non-profit media association serving Virginia newspapers and media professionals. Its business model revolves around membership dues, advocacy efforts, advertising services via Commonwealth Media Solutions, and training programs. The association maintains partnerships with related media projects and provides member-exclusive content and services. The website's content and structure support clear communication of its mission and services, reinforcing its market position as a reputable regional press advocate. The presence of a member portal and payment system indicates operational maturity and ongoing member engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS, modern security headers, and anti-bot measures like Google reCAPTCHA. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program suggests gaps in transparency and readiness. Implementing these elements would enhance trust and preparedness. Cookie consent and privacy policy compliance indicate attention to privacy regulations such as GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is solid but could benefit from formalized policies and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and frameworks.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Add incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Virginia Press Association
Description
The Virginia Press Association supports Virginia newspapers through services and resources, advocating for free press ideals since 1881. It offers membership benefits, advocacy, advertising solutions, and professional development.
Key services
Membership benefits, Advocacy and lobbying, Advertising campaigns via Commonwealth Media Solutions, Training and professional development, Publications and newsletters
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 4.5, jQuery, Amazon Polly, AddToAny, Google reCAPTCHA, FontAwesome, SiteOrigin Widgets, GeoDirectory
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Piwik/Matomo (stats.our-hometown.com)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRotate Professional
Tracking pixels
AddToAny
Marketing tools
AddToAny social sharing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is focused on Virginia Press Association activities and services
  3. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress)
  4. Good SEO and structured data implementation
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content
  6. WHOIS data is missing or privacy protected, limiting domain trust analysis
  7. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 4.5 for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It leverages Amazon Polly for audio articles, AddToAny for social sharing, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. Hosting uses AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, enhancing performance and availability. SEO is supported by All in One SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and articles. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Some custom CSS and JavaScript enhance user experience and functionality. Opportunities exist to modernize frameworks and improve accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vpa.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vpa.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.