Skip to main content

Security report for vopak.com

Royal Vopak · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Royal Vopak operates as a global independent infrastructure provider specializing in tank storage solutions, positioning itself as the world’s leading company in this sector. The website reflects a large enterprise with a focus on energy transition, sustainability, and terminal operations, targeting industrial and commercial clients worldwide. The digital presence is professional, with a modern design and good mobile optimization, supported by a Drupal CMS platform and integration of analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for consent management. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and incident response information are absent. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, but the website content and branding suggest legitimacy. Privacy compliance is partially met with cookie consent but lacks a clear privacy policy page. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vopak.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vopak.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
728
Employees
43
Customers
464
Third parties
221
Weak passwords
16%

Latest record dated 2026-06-13 · 62 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for vopak.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –acstst-irl-01.vopak.com2026-06-13
  • –acsacc-irl-01.vopak.com2026-06-13
  • –acsacc-sgp-01.vopak.com2026-06-11
  • –acstst-irl-01.vopak.com2026-05-15
  • –acsprd-irl-01.vopak.com2026-05-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Royal Vopak holds a strong market position as a leader in tank storage infrastructure, serving global energy and transportation sectors. Their business model focuses on providing independent storage solutions, supporting energy transition and sustainability initiatives. The company leverages partnerships and third-party services for analytics and marketing, indicating a mature digital ecosystem. The presence of a dedicated career site suggests active recruitment and growth. However, the absence of detailed WHOIS data and contact information may impact stakeholder trust. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand and professional online presence, targeting industrial clients and investors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness perception. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing cookies is managed via consent but implies a moderate level of user tracking. Enhancing security documentation and adding security headers would improve the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  2. Add explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to HTTP responses.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security inquiries.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response page with dedicated contact channels.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Royal Vopak
Description
Royal Vopak is a global independent infrastructure provider and the world’s leading tank storage company.
Key services
Tank storage, Energy transition support, Sustainability initiatives, Terminal operations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cookiebot, Hotjar, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
LinkedIn cookies, Vimeo embedded content
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  2. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. Website content is professional and consistent with a large enterprise in the energy sector.
  7. Use of third-party analytics and marketing tools is extensive but consented.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a Drupal CMS platform, using modern web technologies including JavaScript, Google Fonts, and third-party services like Cookiebot and Hotjar. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. The site uses cookie consent management to comply with GDPR. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is mature but could benefit from additional security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vopak.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vopak.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.