Skip to main content

Security report for voetbalinhaarlem.nl

Voetbal in Haarlem · Media · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Voetbal in Haarlem is a niche local media website dedicated to amateur football news and updates in the Haarlem region of the Netherlands. Established in 2015, it serves a focused community of football enthusiasts by providing timely news, match reports, tournament information, photo galleries, and podcasts. The website maintains a consistent brand presence with active social media channels and uses modern web technologies including WordPress, Bootstrap, and various plugins for SEO, analytics, and user engagement. The technical infrastructure is solid with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, ensuring secure and trustworthy access. However, the site lacks a publicly accessible privacy policy and terms of service, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. Cookie consent is implemented, reflecting some privacy awareness. Security posture is generally good but could be improved by adding security headers and vulnerability disclosure information. Overall, the site is a well-maintained, professional local sports media outlet with moderate risk and room for compliance enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching voetbalinhaarlem.nl

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention voetbalinhaarlem.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for voetbalinhaarlem.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a small-scale media publisher focused on the amateur football segment in Haarlem. Its business model revolves around content publishing and community engagement, likely monetized through advertising and sponsorships as indicated by partner logos and ad networks like Sponsorlink. The target audience includes local football fans, clubs, and sports enthusiasts. The site demonstrates steady content updates and a strong local market position within its niche. Partnerships with local businesses and sponsors enhance its ecosystem. The absence of direct contact details and formal business registrations suggests a lean operation focused on content rather than direct sales or services.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate. HTTPS is properly configured with DNSSEC, and Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent. However, the lack of a privacy policy, terms of service, security.txt, and explicit security headers like CSP or X-Frame-Options indicates gaps in security governance and transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from formalizing its security policies and improving header configurations to enhance protection against common web threats.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) and other security headers (X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to minimize security risks and maintain performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Voetbal in Haarlem
Description
Voetbal in Haarlem geeft updates over het laatste nieuws van het amateurvoetbal in Haarlem en omgeving.
Key services
News updates, Match reports, Tournament information, Photo galleries, Podcasts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights), jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper.js, Photo Gallery plugin, YOP Poll plugin, AddToAny sharing
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced with SSL
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Sponsorlink
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin), AddToAny social sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-maintained local sports news portal focused on amateur football in Haarlem region.
  2. Content is regularly updated with news, photos, and podcasts.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via a plugin.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via search and forms.
  6. Uses standard WordPress plugins and technologies.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  8. Social media presence is active and consistent with brand.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, and several plugins for SEO (Yoast), analytics (MonsterInsights), social sharing (AddToAny), and photo galleries. The site uses Google Fonts and external CDN resources. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is enhanced by structured data (JSON-LD) and meta tags. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site uses DNSSEC and HTTPS, indicating a secure DNS and transport layer. Some technical debt is noted in missing advanced security headers and incomplete privacy compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with voetbalinhaarlem.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review voetbalinhaarlem.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.