Skip to main content

Security report for vlissa.lv

Tūrisma firma Vlissa · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tūrisma firma Vlissa is a Latvian travel agency specializing in organizing tours, visa processing, and hotel reservations primarily for Latvian and EU citizens. The company offers a wide range of travel packages including charter flights, exotic destinations, and last-minute deals for the year 2025. The website is built on WordPress using the WPZOOM theme framework and integrates common web technologies such as jQuery, Scriptaculous, and Google Analytics for tracking. While the site is accessible and provides detailed travel content, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vlissa.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Vlissa operates as a small-sized travel agency focused on the Latvian market, targeting individual travelers, families, and corporate clients. Its business model revolves around providing comprehensive travel services including visa assistance and electronic travel authorizations (ETA). The company leverages digital marketing tools like Yoast SEO and Google Analytics to reach its audience. The website content is rich and relevant, indicating active business operations and a diverse portfolio of travel destinations. However, the absence of formal privacy and security policies may pose challenges in regulatory compliance and customer trust. The company does not publicly disclose its founding year or parent/subsidiary relationships, suggesting an independent operation. The lack of WHOIS data limits external verification of legitimacy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No forms are present on the homepage, minimizing immediate input-related risks, but also indicating limited interactive data collection. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated software.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tūrisma firma Vlissa
Description
Tūrisma firma Vlissa piedāvā ceļojumu tūres, viesnīcu rezervācijas, vīzu noformēšanu un elektroniskās ieceļošanas atļaujas Apvienotajā Karalistē vai Anglijā (ETA) Latvijas un ES pilsoņiem. Piedāvā dažādas ceļojumu iespējas uz populārām un eksotiskām vietām, kā arī individuālas tūres un grupu braucienus.
Key services
Ceļojumu tūres, Vīzu noformēšana, Elektroniskās ieceļošanas atļaujas (ETA), Viesnīcu rezervācija, Čartera lidojumi
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, jQuery, Scriptaculous, Lightbox 2
Frameworks
WPZOOM Theme Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based travel agency site targeting Latvian customers.
  2. Content is rich with detailed travel offers for 2025.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage content.
  6. No visible security policies or incident response contacts.
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Yoast SEO indicates some digital marketing maturity.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the WPZOOM theme framework and uses several JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Scriptaculous. SEO is enhanced via the Yoast SEO plugin, and Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as fonts.googleapis.com and googletagmanager.com. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. No advanced accessibility features were detected. The site lacks modern security headers and visible compliance mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small travel agency website but could be modernized and secured further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vlissa.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vlissa.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.