Skip to main content

Security report for vkb.de

Versicherungskammer Bayern · Finance · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Versicherungskammer Bayern is a large, established insurance provider based in Germany, offering a comprehensive portfolio of insurance products including auto, home, liability, health, travel, life, and retirement plans. The website targets a broad audience including private customers, families, young people, professionals, farmers, and corporate clients. The company emphasizes customer service with online portals for contract management and claims reporting. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Modernizr, integrates a consent management platform (Usercentrics), and includes accessibility tools (Eye-Able), reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured for user navigation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied and sandboxed iframes used, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is supported by a cookie consent mechanism, though no explicit privacy or terms of service pages were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of vkb.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vkb.de

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vkb.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,106
Employees
0
Customers
1,097
Third parties
9
Weak passwords
7%

19 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for vkb.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector, specifically insurance, with a strong regional presence in Bavaria, Germany. Its business model focuses on direct insurance sales and service provision to both private and corporate customers. The website reflects a well-organized product catalog and service offerings, including digital tools for customers. Customer testimonials and professional branding enhance trust. The absence of detailed WHOIS registrant data limits full verification but does not raise immediate concerns. The company appears to maintain a moderate level of digital marketing and analytics integration, primarily through Adobe Tag Manager and Usercentrics. No affiliate or retargeting programs were detected. The company’s strategic focus on accessibility and digital customer service indicates a forward-looking approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and sandboxed iframe content. The presence of a consent management platform indicates attention to privacy compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site uses reputable third-party scripts and libraries. Overall, security practices are adequate but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Include explicit contact information such as company emails and physical addresses to enhance business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Versicherungskammer Bayern
Description
Versicherungskammer Bayern offers insurance, private pension plans, and secure investments. They provide a wide range of insurance products including auto, home, liability, legal protection, health, travel, life, retirement, and investment products.
Key services
Auto & Zweirad insurance, Haus & Wohnen insurance, Haftpflicht insurance, Rechtsschutz insurance, Gesundheit insurance, Reise insurance, Leben & Einkommenssicherung insurance, Altersvorsorge, Online services including contract management and claims reporting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.1, Modernizr, Usercentrics CMP, Adobe Tag Manager, Eye-Able accessibility tools
Frameworks
Foundation (CSS classes detected)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by canonical URL https)
  • Content Security Policy not detected
  • Use of sandboxed iframe for embedded content
  • Consent management platform (Usercentrics) implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Tag Manager, Usercentrics CMP
Marketing tools
Adobe Tag Manager, Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the analyzed page.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Usercentrics.
  4. Multiple insurance product categories and services are well structured.
  5. No direct company contact emails or physical addresses found in the provided content.
  6. Phone number for claims is provided with clear context.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and consent management tools.
  9. Good accessibility features including Eye-Able integration.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a CMS platform identified as OEVD CMS, using modern front-end technologies including jQuery 3.6.1 and Modernizr for feature detection. It integrates Usercentrics for GDPR-compliant cookie consent and Adobe Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Accessibility is enhanced by Eye-Able tools. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with clear navigation menus and categorized insurance products. Performance is moderate, with multiple CSS and JS resources loaded. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses sandboxed iframes for embedded content, improving security. SEO is supported by meta tags and canonical URLs. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for security header enhancements and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 55/100Medium16 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vkb.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vkb.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.