Skip to main content

Security report for vitovec.cz

Vítovec corp. a.s. · Finance · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vítovec corp. a.s. is a Czech insurance brokerage company specializing exclusively in insurance and related financial products and services. The company targets both businesses and individual citizens, offering a wide range of insurance products including property, liability, cyber risk, and personal insurance. The website reflects a professional and established market position with partnerships such as being a gold partner of HC Škoda Plzeň and providing detailed insurance information and guidance. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics for tracking. It is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and policies could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and business information appear legitimate and professional. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and user-friendly platform for insurance services in the Czech Republic.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vitovec.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector as an insurance broker, focusing on both corporate and individual clients. Its business model revolves around providing insurance products and advisory services, supported by a strong online presence with detailed product information and customer support channels. The partnership ecosystem includes insurance companies and local entities like sports teams, enhancing brand visibility. The website's content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a stable market position. Growth indicators include active content updates, video archives, and customer engagement features. The company leverages digital marketing tools and analytics to optimize user experience and compliance, reflecting a mature digital strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response information, and security.txt files indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The site lacks certain security headers that could enhance protection against common web threats. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be strengthened by publishing formal security and incident response documentation and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
VÍTOVEC corp. a.s.
Registration number
26367793
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vítovec corp. a.s.
Description
Společnost VÍTOVEC corp. a.s. se soustředí výhradně na oblast pojištění a souvisejících finančních produktů a služeb.
Key services
Insurance for companies and entrepreneurs, Insurance for citizens, Information services, Insurance product documentation, Claims handling guidance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Elementor, Google Analytics, Google Maps API, Complianz GDPR plugin, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced with SSL
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with detailed consent management.
  4. Professional insurance brokerage site targeting Czech market.
  5. Multiple external trusted domains linked including social media and partners.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress with Elementor).
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No terms of service page explicitly found.
  9. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper.js for UI components and interactivity. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking with anonymized IPs, and Google Maps API is integrated for location services. The site employs a GDPR-compliant cookie consent plugin (Complianz) with opt-in mechanisms for marketing cookies. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. The technical stack is current and well-maintained, though hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO and accessibility further, as well as to implement additional security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vitovec.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vitovec.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.