Skip to main content

Security report for visitzagrebcounty.hr

Turistička zajednica Zagrebačke županije · Hospitality · Croatia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Visit Zagreb County is the official tourism board for Zagreb County, Croatia, promoting the region's cultural, natural, and gastronomic attractions. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for tourists, offering information on events, active holidays, health tourism, and sustainable tourism initiatives. The organization positions itself as a regional authority with a focus on enhancing visitor experience and promoting local heritage. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, with multilingual support via TranslatePress. It employs modern web technologies and includes spam protection mechanisms. The site is hosted by Plus Hosting Grupa d.o.o., a Croatian hosting provider, and uses HTTPS to secure communications. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses spam protection but lacks explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are important for GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website's Croatian origin and business purpose, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned to serve its audience. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening would enhance its posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching visitzagrebcounty.hr

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small-sized governmental tourism entity focused on promoting Zagreb County as a travel destination. Its business model revolves around regional tourism marketing, event promotion, and cultural heritage preservation. The site targets tourists interested in active holidays, gastronomy, culture, and sustainable tourism. Partnerships with national and regional organizations, as well as EU projects, strengthen its market position. The content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a credible and authoritative presence in the hospitality and government sectors.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and spam protection is implemented via the Altcha plugin. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or security policy information is published. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements in headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve privacy transparency.
  2. Add explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Turistička zajednica Zagrebačke županije
Description
Slikovita mjesta s mirnim ritmom života, pitoma i plodna sela, obilje prirodnih ljepota... The website promotes tourism in Zagreb County, Croatia, highlighting culture, gastronomy, events, and sustainable tourism.
Key services
Tourism information, Event promotion, Cultural and gastronomic highlights, Sustainable tourism initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Altcha spam protection, TranslatePress multilingual
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Spam protection via Altcha
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Independent Analytics (custom plugin)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Elementor, TranslatePress
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional tourism board site for Zagreb County, Croatia
  2. Content is rich with tourism-related information and events
  3. Uses WordPress with Elementor and multilingual support
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found
  5. Security headers could be improved
  6. Social media presence is strong and official
  7. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is relatively new but appropriate
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor as the page builder, supported by jQuery and TranslatePress for multilingual capabilities. Hosting is provided by a Croatian hosting company, ensuring regional consistency. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic but present. The site uses custom analytics via an independent analytics plugin, avoiding major third-party trackers. There is some technical debt in missing security headers and lack of cookie consent. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a regional tourism site but can be improved with security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with visitzagrebcounty.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review visitzagrebcounty.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.