město Tábor · Hospitality · Czech Republic
Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.
The website www.visittabor.eu serves as the official tourism portal for the city of Tábor, Czech Republic. It provides comprehensive information about the city's attractions, culture, accommodation, sightseeing, gastronomy, and practical visitor details. The site targets tourists and visitors interested in exploring Tábor and the South Bohemian region. The business model is government-supported tourism promotion, positioning itself as a key regional tourism information source with official city branding and certifications such as A.T.I.C. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, and tracking tools like Google Analytics and Adform. It uses the Nette Framework CMS inferred from form structures and AJAX usage. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in security headers and accessibility. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, security headers are missing, and there is no explicit security policy or incident response information published. The use of third-party tracking scripts is transparent with user consent. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and documented policies. The overall risk assessment is low, with the site demonstrating legitimacy through official contact information, consistent branding, and certifications. The lack of WHOIS data is due to registry privacy policies and does not detract from trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing a security policy, enhancing accessibility, and adding a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to further strengthen security and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention visittabor.eu, from OffSeq Breach.
2 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for visittabor.eu.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with visittabor.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review visittabor.eu.