Skip to main content

Security report for visitogre.lv

Ogres novada Tūrisma informācijas centrs · Hospitality · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

64/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website visitogre.lv serves as the official tourism portal for the Ogres novads region in Latvia, operated by the Ogres novada Tūrisma informācijas centrs. It provides comprehensive information about local attractions, events, accommodations, dining, and active leisure activities, targeting tourists and visitors interested in exploring the region. The portal is well-branded, consistent, and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Social media integration and contact details enhance its credibility and accessibility. Technically, the site uses a traditional tech stack including jQuery 1.10.2, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Google Maps API for location services. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks modern security headers and uses an outdated jQuery version, which could pose security risks. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured navigation. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers and outdated libraries are areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is partial; a cookie policy is present but lacks an explicit consent mechanism, and no dedicated privacy policy or incident response information is found. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but the domain appears legitimate based on website content and branding. Overall, the website is a trustworthy and professional regional tourism portal with room for technical and security enhancements. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and technology updates would strengthen its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching visitogre.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Ogres novada Tūrisma informācijas centrs operates as a small, government-affiliated entity focused on promoting tourism in the Ogres novads region. Its market position is that of an official regional tourism information provider, offering services such as event promotion, accommodation listings, and local attraction guides. The business model is informational and promotional, likely funded by local government budgets or tourism grants. The target audience includes tourists, local visitors, and cultural enthusiasts. Partnerships with Latvia Travel, Vidzeme Tourism Association, and other local organizations indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The website's content and social media presence support community engagement and regional tourism growth. No direct revenue streams or e-commerce functionalities are evident, emphasizing its role as a public service portal.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted data transmission. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces its defense against common web attacks like clickjacking and content injection. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.10.2) presents potential vulnerabilities that should be addressed. No visible sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy compliance is limited; while cookie usage is disclosed, no consent mechanism or comprehensive privacy policy is present. Incident response and security contact information are absent, which could delay response to security incidents. Overall, the site is moderately secure but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Develop and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly outlining data collection, usage, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to obtain explicit user consent for tracking and cookies in line with privacy regulations.
  5. Add dedicated security and incident response contact information to facilitate timely reporting and handling of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ogres novada Tūrisma informācijas centrs
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ogres novada Tūrisma informācijas centrs
Description
Informācija par tūrisma objektiem, jaunumi un aktualitātes.
Key services
Tourism information, Event announcements, Accommodation listings, Local attractions and routes, Contact and support for visitors
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official tourism portal for Ogres novads, Latvia.
  2. Content is well structured and relevant to tourists and local visitors.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  4. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  5. Uses HTTPS and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. No privacy policy page explicitly found but cookie policy and sīkdatnes page present.
  7. No terms of service or incident response information found.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Draugiem.lv, Twitter, Instagram.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a traditional web stack utilizing jQuery 1.10.2, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Google Maps API for geolocation features. The HTML structure is valid and includes appropriate meta tags for SEO. Performance is moderate with some room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The site lacks modern frontend frameworks or CMS indications, suggesting a custom or legacy build. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The use of asynchronous loading for Google Tag Manager and Google Maps scripts is a positive performance practice. However, the outdated jQuery version and absence of security headers indicate technical debt and potential security risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but would benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with visitogre.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review visitogre.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.