Skip to main content

Security report for visitnaantali.com

Visit Naantali · Hospitality · Finland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Visit Naantali operates as the official tourism website for the Naantali region in Finland, providing comprehensive information about local attractions, events, accommodations, and activities. The site targets tourists and visitors seeking to explore Naantali, positioning itself as a trusted and authoritative source for travel planning in the area. The business model focuses on tourism promotion and visitor engagement through digital content and booking facilitation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern technologies including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, Yoast SEO for search optimization, and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The infrastructure includes Google Tag Manager and Matomo Analytics for tracking and performance monitoring. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features, though some accessibility aspects could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and employs clientTransferProhibited status on the domain to prevent unauthorized transfers. Cookie consent is actively managed, and no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and additional HTTP security headers could be implemented to strengthen security posture further. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly platform for tourism promotion with a solid technical foundation and good privacy compliance. The absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages in the scanned content is a gap that should be addressed to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching visitnaantali.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention visitnaantali.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for visitnaantali.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Visit Naantali holds a strong market position as the official tourism portal for the Naantali region, leveraging local partnerships and digital content to attract visitors. Its competitive advantage lies in authoritative content, official endorsements, and comprehensive service listings including accommodation and activities. The business model is primarily informational and promotional, likely supported by local government or tourism boards. The target customer segments include domestic and international tourists interested in cultural, natural, and recreational experiences in Naantali. Growth indicators include a decade-long domain presence and integration of modern digital marketing tools. The partnership ecosystem includes third-party service providers for booking and analytics, enhancing operational capabilities.

Security posture

The security maturity of Visit Naantali is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, and domain transfer protections are in place. The use of Cookiebot ensures GDPR-compliant cookie management, and analytics are handled via privacy-conscious Matomo. However, the lack of DNSSEC and some common security headers indicates room for improvement. No evidence of incident response policies or security certifications was found, suggesting these areas are either not publicly disclosed or not implemented. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the scanned content. Overall, the security posture supports the business needs but would benefit from enhanced DNS security and formalized security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Consider publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Visit Naantali
Description
Naantali on Pohjolan Portofino, josta löytyvät parhaat tarinan arvoiset kokemukset ja elämykset Naantalissa. Löydä tekemistä lomallesi!
Key services
Tourism information, Event listings, Accommodation booking, Activity suggestions, Local services information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Bootstrap 5, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Matomo Analytics, JavaScript ES6 modules
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS
  3. Has a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service page found in the provided content
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  6. Strong SEO and structured data implementation
  7. No security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data detected
  8. No suspicious or malicious external domains linked
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a mature WordPress CMS with a modern front-end framework (Bootstrap 5) ensuring responsive design and good user experience across devices. SEO is well managed via Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts including analytics and cookie consent tools. Hosting details are not explicit but domain registrar and DNS providers are reputable. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA roles and semantic HTML. The technical stack is well suited for the business purpose but should be monitored for plugin updates and security patches to avoid technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with visitnaantali.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review visitnaantali.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.