Skip to main content

Security report for visitluxembourg.com

Visit Luxembourg · Hospitality · Luxembourg

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Visit Luxembourg operates as the official tourism promotion website for the country of Luxembourg, providing comprehensive travel and cultural information to visitors. The site targets tourists and travelers interested in exploring Luxembourg's heritage, events, and attractions. It leverages a modern TYPO3 CMS platform and integrates advanced cookie consent management via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. The website employs multiple third-party services for analytics and marketing, including Google Analytics and Meta Platforms, to optimize user engagement and advertising effectiveness. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, although explicit security headers could be further enhanced. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy given the professional content and branding. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for its governmental and hospitality sector role.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of visitluxembourg.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching visitluxembourg.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a key player in Luxembourg's tourism sector, offering detailed visitor information and leveraging partnerships with payment processors and geographic data providers. Its business model focuses on promoting tourism through content and event marketing, supported by data-driven advertising and analytics. The site’s integration with major ad networks and tracking services indicates a sophisticated marketing approach aimed at maximizing visitor engagement and conversion. The lack of explicit contact information suggests a focus on information dissemination rather than direct customer service. The partnership ecosystem includes Stripe for payments and geoportail.lu for mapping, reflecting a well-rounded operational infrastructure.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and the use of Cookiebot for managing user consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable scripts were detected in the HTML content. However, some common security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options were not explicitly observed and should be verified or implemented to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing attacks. The use of reputable third-party services and the absence of suspicious domains contribute positively to the security posture. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved to demonstrate transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish clear security policy and incident response information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and general inquiries to improve user confidence.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain trustworthiness and legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Visit Luxembourg
Description
Discover the enchanting allure of Luxembourg, a European destination where medieval charm meets contemporary sophistication.
Key services
Tourism information, Event promotion, Travel guides, Cultural highlights
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, CrowdRiff, Cloudflare (likely for CDN and security)
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party services

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Piwik Analytics Platform
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Adform, Appnexus
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, CrowdRiff
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Uses modern CMS TYPO3 and integrates Cookiebot for GDPR compliance.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  4. Strong privacy and cookie policies with detailed cookie categorization.
  5. Multiple third-party integrations for analytics, marketing, and content delivery.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in HTML.
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and lowers domain trust slightly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and scalable content management system suitable for enterprise and governmental use. It integrates Cookiebot for cookie consent management and Google Tag Manager for analytics deployment. The site uses external services such as CrowdRiff for visual content and Cloudflare likely for CDN and security. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, though hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and improve WHOIS transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with visitluxembourg.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review visitluxembourg.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.