Skip to main content

Security report for visitfuerteventura.com

Hospitality · Spain

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.visitfuerteventura.com serves as a regional tourism information portal focused on promoting Fuerteventura, one of the Canary Islands. It provides rich content about beaches, activities, and travel planning for visitors. The site uses Drupal 10 CMS and integrates modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Didomi for cookie consent management. While the content and design quality are good, the absence of WHOIS data and explicit privacy policies reduces overall trustworthiness. No direct contact or security incident response information is available, which is a gap for compliance and user trust. The site is well-structured for its target audience of tourists and travelers interested in Fuerteventura and the Canary Islands.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching visitfuerteventura.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site positions itself as a key regional tourism information source, linking to partner sites for other Canary Islands, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Its business model is informational and promotional, likely funded by regional tourism authorities or partnerships. The content targets tourists seeking travel inspiration and practical information. The lack of detailed business registration or contact info suggests it may be operated by a public or semi-public entity. The site’s integration with related domains strengthens its market presence in the Canary Islands tourism sector.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, no security headers were detected in the provided data, and no explicit privacy policy or terms of service were found, which are critical for GDPR compliance. The absence of contact information for security incidents or data protection officers further weakens the security posture. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Didomi requires ongoing monitoring to avoid vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with better transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Consider DNSSEC implementation and verify domain registration details to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Un paraíso con más de 150km de playas de arena blanca y agua turquesa, donde descubrir inmensos paisajes naturales y compartir el carácter abierto de su gente. Una isla donde practicar un sinfín de actividades en las mejores condiciones.
Key services
Tourism information, Travel planning, Activity and location guides
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Didomi Consent SDK
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL scheme)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), Didomi Consent SDK
Marketing tools
Didomi Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about Fuerteventura tourism.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which reduces trustworthiness.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with Didomi.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  6. Uses Drupal 10 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries.
  7. Includes Google Tag Manager and tracking scripts.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No visible security or incident response contact information.
  10. No certifications or compliance badges visible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and robust CMS platform, using jQuery and other standard JavaScript libraries. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Didomi for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with video content and multiple external scripts potentially impacting load times. No hosting provider details were found. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with visitfuerteventura.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review visitfuerteventura.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.