Skip to main content

Security report for visitdartmoor.co.uk

Visit Dartmoor · Hospitality · United Kingdom

Partial score · DNS & email only

68/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Visit Dartmoor is a well-established regional tourism website founded in 2006, providing comprehensive information on accommodation, food, attractions, and activities in the Dartmoor area of the United Kingdom. The website targets tourists and visitors seeking to explore Dartmoor, offering detailed guides, booking options, and an online shop for related products. Its market position is that of a trusted local tourism portal with consistent branding and a professional online presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as WooCommerce for e-commerce, Elementor for page building, and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Maps APIs to enhance user experience and track visitor data. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and moderate performance, with room for improvement in accessibility features. From a security perspective, the website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks some recommended security headers and does not publish a formal security policy or incident response contacts. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, reflecting a basic but adequate privacy posture. Overall, Visit Dartmoor presents a low-risk profile with a strong business credibility and good technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response readiness, and accessibility compliance would further enhance its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching visitdartmoor.co.uk

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
68

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Visit Dartmoor operates as an important entity within the hospitality and tourism sector, focusing on the Dartmoor region in the UK. Its business model revolves around providing detailed tourism information, accommodation listings, and booking facilitation, supplemented by an online shop. The company leverages digital marketing tools and social media to engage its target audience of tourists and local visitors. The domain's long registration history supports its established market presence. While no parent or subsidiary companies are identified, the site maintains partnerships through social media and external service integrations. The business shows consistent branding and high-quality content, positioning it competitively within regional tourism portals.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with mandatory HTTPS encryption and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates room for improvement. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact, which could hinder timely response to security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies, but further enhancements such as a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file would strengthen the security culture and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet recognized standards, improving usability for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update all WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Visit Dartmoor
Description
Official tourism website providing information on accommodation, food, attractions, and activities in Dartmoor.
Key services
Accommodation listings, Attractions and things to do, Food and drink guides, Event submissions, Online shop for Dartmoor-related products
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Maps API, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Elementor, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRotate
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed tourism portal for Dartmoor.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with popular plugins for SEO and e-commerce.
  3. Includes comprehensive navigation and content structure.
  4. Social media presence is active and linked.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  6. Security posture is good but can be improved with additional headers and policies.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  8. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML; contact likely via forms and social media.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform utilizing Elementor for design flexibility and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking and performance analysis, alongside Google Maps API for location services. The site uses Yoast SEO to optimize search engine visibility and includes reCAPTCHA for form security. Performance is moderate, with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The hosting provider is linked to the registrar SWBROADBAND Ltd t/a cloudabove, indicating a stable infrastructure. Technical debt appears low, but ongoing maintenance and security updates are essential to sustain operational integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with visitdartmoor.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review visitdartmoor.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.