Skip to main content

Security report for vision-zero-oncology.de

Vision Zero e.V. · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vision Zero Oncology is a German non-profit initiative focused on reducing avoidable cancer deaths through collaboration among scientific, medical, and industrial stakeholders. The website serves as a platform for information dissemination, event promotion, and publication sharing, targeting healthcare professionals, researchers, and the public. Technically, the site uses a modern Bootstrap framework, integrates Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management, and employs Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The hosting is managed via One.com with HTTPS enforced, indicating a secure baseline. Security posture is solid with room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting its mission effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vision-zero-oncology.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vision-zero-oncology.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for vision-zero-oncology.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a key player in oncology-focused non-profit healthcare initiatives in Germany, leveraging partnerships with recognized entities such as Dekade Gegen Krebs and Medical Tribune. Its business model revolves around advocacy, research collaboration, and public engagement rather than commercial activities. The website reflects a medium-sized operation with consistent branding and a clear focus on cancer prevention and treatment innovation. Growth potential lies in expanding partnerships and increasing public awareness through events like the Vision Zero Summit.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of reputable third-party services for cookie consent and bot protection. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published, which could be improved to enhance trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Security headers could be more comprehensively implemented to harden the site against common web attacks. Overall, the security measures align with the organization's non-profit status and digital maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding explicit contact emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vision Zero e.V.
Description
Breite Initiative aus Wissenschaft und Forschung, medizinischen Fachgesellschaften und Verbänden, Stiftungen, Medien und Industrie, um das Ziel zu erreichen, dass niemand mehr an Krebs sterben muss.
Key services
Initiative coordination, Research and knowledge dissemination, Events and summits (e.g., Vision Zero Summit 2025), Publications and position papers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, jQuery, FontAwesome, Cookiebot, Google reCAPTCHA, PHP (server-side indicated by .php files)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with Cookiebot
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categorization.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML; contact is via contact form.
  4. No terms of service page detected.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of Google reCAPTCHA indicates anti-bot measures on forms.
  7. External links mostly to reputable healthcare and partner organizations.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Content is in German with some English navigation options.
  10. Website uses HTTPS and is hosted on One.com.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a PHP-based backend with a Bootstrap frontend framework, ensuring responsive design and good mobile optimization. It uses Cookiebot for cookie management and Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. Hosting is provided by One.com, a common shared hosting provider. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The site lacks a known CMS or uses a custom solution, which may impact ease of content management. SEO practices are adequate with proper meta tags and structured cookie consent. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further with enhanced security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vision-zero-oncology.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vision-zero-oncology.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.