Skip to main content

Security report for vipsgas.cz

VIPS gas s.r.o. · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VIPS gas s.r.o. is a Czech-based company specializing in the distribution and servicing of heating and climate technology products, including gas boilers, heat pumps, measuring instruments, and air conditioning systems. The company targets both professional installers and end customers, offering a comprehensive product portfolio and technical support services. Their market position is that of a reputable regional player with a medium-sized operation and a strong focus on Immergas brand products. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Carousel, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. The site is well-structured with good SEO practices and mobile optimization. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing purposes, with a cookie consent mechanism in place to comply with privacy regulations. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks visible security headers and a published security policy or incident response information. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the professional presentation and clear contact details support legitimacy. Overall, VIPS gas s.r.o. presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with room for improvement in security transparency and domain registration visibility. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and improving incident response communication.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vipsgas.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector, focusing on heating and climate technology products. Their business model combines B2B and B2C sales, supported by service, training, and technical consulting. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a broad product catalog and active social media engagement. Partnerships with Immergas and a professional web development firm indicate a stable ecosystem. Growth potential lies in expanding service offerings and enhancing digital marketing. The company maintains a medium size with a clear regional focus in the Czech Republic.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, the lack of security headers and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. The company should improve transparency around security measures and consider implementing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide a clear channel for vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  3. Develop and publish a formal security policy outlining frameworks, controls, and compliance commitments.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure they are up to date and free from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing more visible certifications, testimonials, or trust badges on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
VIPS gas s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ25428942
Registration number
25428942
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VIPS gas s.r.o.
Description
Distributor and service provider of heating technology products including gas boilers, heat pumps, measuring and diagnostic devices, air conditioning, and related accessories.
Key services
Sales of Immergas gas boilers and accessories, Service and maintenance, Technical support and training, Online product catalog and ordering, Consulting and project support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, LightGallery, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. Clear contact information and company details provided.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented in Czech language.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  6. Modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools used.
  7. No signs of malicious or adult content.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  9. Multiple product categories and detailed offerings.
  10. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, and LightGallery for UI and UX enhancements. Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager are integrated for typography and analytics. The site appears to be custom-built or uses a proprietary CMS, as no common CMS signatures were detected. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. There is an opportunity to improve accessibility features and implement modern security headers. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vipsgas.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vipsgas.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.