Skip to main content

Security report for violet.lv

Violet.lv · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Violet.lv is a Latvian-based e-commerce platform specializing in flower and gift delivery services across Riga and Latvia. The website offers a variety of products including flower bouquets, flower boxes, gift boxes, and greeting cards, with a promise of fast courier delivery starting from 2 hours. The business targets general consumers looking for quality floral gifts and related products. The site is localized primarily in Latvian with options for English and Russian, indicating a regional focus with some international accessibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, leveraging common web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap icons. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and TalkMe for online chat support, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, but lacks visible advanced security policies or incident response information. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected, which is a gap given GDPR applicability. Overall, the site presents as a legitimate small retail business with good content quality and user experience but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching violet.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention violet.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
17
Employees
2
Customers
15
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2025-07-27 · 1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for violet.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –violet.lv2025-07-27
  • –violet.lv2025-04-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate violet.lv and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
2
Registered
2
Resolving
2
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-20

Masked preview

  • vi•••••.lvLowaddition
  • vi•••.let.lvNot ratedsubdomain

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of violet.lv with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector, focusing on flower and gift delivery within Latvia, primarily Riga. Its business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce, with WooCommerce facilitating product sales and order management. The presence of multiple language options suggests an intent to serve a broader audience beyond Latvian speakers. The company maintains clear contact channels via phone and online chat, enhancing customer engagement. However, the absence of detailed company registration or certification information limits deeper business credibility insights. The website's product range and pricing indicate a mid-market positioning with emphasis on quality and timely delivery. Marketing and analytics tools are used moderately, with Google Tag Manager and TalkMe chat integration. There is no evidence of affiliate programs or extensive advertising networks. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused niche and localized market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and several security headers implemented, which protect against common web vulnerabilities. The use of a WordPress security plugin to prevent user enumeration is a positive indicator. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance risk under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small e-commerce site but would benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and privacy compliance improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner and mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Publish clear security and incident response policies accessible to users.
  3. Add a terms of service page detailing user rights and obligations.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Violet.lv
Description
Ziedu piegāde Rīgā un Latvijā piedāvā kvalitatīvu piegādes servisu ar skaistiem un elegantiem pušķiem un dāvanām. Ziedu kurjers no 2h!
Key services
Flower bouquets, Flower boxes, Gift boxes, Greeting cards, Fast flower courier delivery (from 2 hours)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Bootstrap Icons, Select2, Google Tag Manager, TalkMe online chat
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugin to prevent user enumeration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
TalkMe online chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian flower and gift e-commerce platform
  2. Content is in Latvian with language switcher for English and Russian
  3. Uses WooCommerce for product catalog and shopping cart
  4. Includes online chat support via TalkMe
  5. No visible privacy cookie consent banner despite GDPR relevance
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  8. No terms of service page detected
  9. Contact phone number +371 20523707 clearly displayed
  10. No company emails found in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and widely used CMS platform, WordPress, with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses standard web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap icons, and Select2 for enhanced UI components. Google Tag Manager is employed for analytics, and TalkMe provides live chat support, indicating integration of customer engagement tools. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. The site uses security plugins to prevent user enumeration and enforces HTTPS with appropriate security headers. However, there is room for improvement in privacy compliance and accessibility standards. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a functional and user-friendly e-commerce experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with violet.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review violet.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.